• John Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    42
    ·
    7 hours ago

    You’ve just described a majority of the Democratic party as well. Don’t forget a majority here was certain that Joe Biden was more dynamic than he’d ever been, and later convinced that supporting Israel’s genocide and neocons would win Kamala the election.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      No. It takes a truly shallow mind to come to this conclusion. Most of us Democrats understand how politics work and knew it was Trump or Harris once Biden stepped down. That’s it, no third option. Only a true idiot or a Trump supporter (same thing) would think not voting, voting this party, it voting for Trump was in anyway better for Israel, Ukraine, and America.

      • dwindling7373@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Not really. If your focus is beyond the next 4 years, you can argue letting Democrats lose is the best strategy to stop wars on the planet down the line.

        In fact if Kamala was going to loose either way (as it happened) it’s a good thing that she lost hard.

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 minutes ago

          Accelerationist arguments always show that the speaker isn’t nearly as smart as they think they are.

        • makyo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Anyone who makes that argument has no idea how bad things can get and how fast.