• iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh lord. This did not need to be a two parter. Man, I miss movies being well contained 90 minute stories.

    • ditty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      89
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The whole Broadway show can be done in a 2 hour-ish performance live, there is no justification to stretch this to two movies other than corporate greed milking every IP to the limit

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        From everything I’ve seen so far about Wicked the movie(s), yes that’s exactly what it is.

        The show is still touring folks, go see the show if you can

    • ME5SENGER_24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Unless its a planned trilogy with 3 strong stories that could semi-standalone (short of context being lost without the other installments) then any movie that needs more than 2 hours should just be a mini series. You wanna tell a 4 hour long story about the Wizard of Oz? Fine, stick it on Netflix and anyone who wants to binge watch it can to make it “feel like a movie” and those who don’t will have 4 - hour long episodes.

        • root_beer@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          The finale would leave loose ends as long as the cables they’re frayed from, and season 2 will either be canceled or cut short so huge compromises will have to be made and nothing is properly resolved

    • Flamekebab@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m starting to suspect that this is why I don’t watch as many films as I’d like to. They’ve all become such a time commitment. Show me what you can do with an hour and a half!

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Just saw part one. As I had suspected, they would’ve been hard pressed to get both acts into one film.

      A Broadway show can get away with a lot more compression. There are no establishing shots on a stage. And Wicked, as a musical, moves. The movie didn’t overstay its welcome, it didn’t waste much time. But it still easily filled its runtime.

      Making the two acts into two films was a good call. Though I suspect the second film won’t be as good as the first, since I’ve always preferred act 1 of the Broadway show.

      It’s really clear to me that the cast and crew weren’t lying when they said they love the musical and wanted to do right by it.