• godzillabacter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    EMS communication over unencrypted channels is limited by HIPAA, patient information must be kept vague to protect patient privacy. In the event that, say, an individuals name needs to be given to the receiving facility to facilitate review of records prior to arrival by the ER physician, some other method of communication has to be used.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Encryption on radio communications would not help that at all. It would still be a HIPAA violation to share sensitive information on a broadcast, even if it is encrypted.

      Edit: I hope y’all downvoters aren’t actually responsible for patient information.

      • chakan2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s very incorrect. End to End encryption is legal under HIPPA. All the receiving parties have likely filled out the HIPPA yearly thing, so they’d be covered.