• wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Edit: I misread the post to be 28% CTR, you can ignore my comment.


    There’s absolutely no fucking way CTR for those is 28%.

    I do not believe that.

    Posts don’t even have a CTR that high, that would mean the average user goes no further than 4 ads before clicking one.

    Now I wish I bought some stock so I could get in on a shareholder lawsuit about them cooking the books on this shit.

    Edit: for context, it’s 0.9% on FB, 1.9% on Google.

    What’s more likely, someone at reddit fucked up an analysis, or these ads are 14x better than Google or 31x better than FB?

    • Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Improved by 28%, not at 28%.

      That would be some awful idiocracy type of future and we’re not there… yet.

    • Ihnivid@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I mean, generally I’m all for shitting on reddit, but there’s also a third option: Reader’s not understanding what 28% better than other ad types means.