Tiime@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 5 days agoDesigners cry quietlylemmy.mlimagemessage-square71fedilinkarrow-up1650arrow-down111
arrow-up1639arrow-down1imageDesigners cry quietlylemmy.mlTiime@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 5 days agomessage-square71fedilink
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up72arrow-down1·5 days agoWhenever that happens, the design is wrong.
minus-squaresuperkretlinkfedilinkarrow-up42·5 days agoFixed. Added a wall with razor wire on top to prevent this.
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·4 days agoAh yes, the hostile architecture approach.
minus-squaresuperkretlinkfedilinkarrow-up17·4 days agoIn IT, sometimes there’s security reasons for the designed detour. But then good design would completely obstruct the shortcut from the user’s view.
minus-squareDuamerthrax@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·4 days agochange log: We’ve adjusted the 20 year old UI to better reflect modern aesthetic trends that our new hires learned in school.
minus-squarenfms@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoI think it’s from the time where things were done manually and round lines were a pain to draw. There wasn’t AutoCAD and undo features in a neat software 🤣
Whenever that happens, the design is wrong.
Fixed. Added a wall with razor wire on top to prevent this.
Ah yes, the hostile architecture approach.
In IT, sometimes there’s security reasons for the designed detour.
But then good design would completely obstruct the shortcut from the user’s view.
change log: We’ve adjusted the 20 year old UI to better reflect modern aesthetic trends that our new hires learned in school.
Works as intended. kthxbye
I think it’s from the time where things were done manually and round lines were a pain to draw. There wasn’t AutoCAD and undo features in a neat software 🤣