• Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Surprising as new hardware hasn’t had a floppy disk drive for years and old equipment is probably running a non supported operating system which is totally vulnerable.

    • Senseless
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      You might be surprised (or not) by the amount of fax machines still being used in germany. It’s not quite the same but also an ancient technology that just refuses to die here. As IT guy it drives me crazy.

      • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        When it comes to faxes, doctors and lawyers seem to be the main supporters in Australia. They have secure messaging available but cling to the insecure and antiquated fax. I’ve integrated fax into medical practice management apps and they thought it was such a step forward (after a while).

  • When I was in Japan a decade ago, email was still rare, the electricity bill requires someone to come to your home and calculate it each month, the ATM wouldn’t work on weekends after certain hours or on holidays, a lot of paperwork to do anything, and other little gotchas like that, that made it feel far behind at times.

    They are still far ahead when it comes to baths and toilets though. The infrastructure is also superior to anything anywhere else except perhaps China.

    • chayleaf@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      huh? I’d say email was quite popular there, it was just tied to the mobile operator (and has then been replaced with Line)

  • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    Well that’s dumb.

    The government can use whatever system it wants, and if there aren’t components on the market it can justify a make work program to domestically produce them.

    Governments were able to run perfectly well without high density removable storage, why is it necessary now?

    Why would it want to get rid of floppy disks?

    • There’s a cost to maintaining old technology, at some point it becomes higher than transitioning to new technology. People have known that since ancient times, that’s why the Neo-Assyrian Empire chose to switch from Akkadian to Aramaic.

      • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        There’s also a cost to transitioning to the new technology.

        Normalizing arbitrary size removable media makes physical exfiltration much easier because no one is asking why you’re using an illegal technology in the government building.

        Floppy disks are not able to identify themselves as a keyboard and release a payload of keystrokes on command, or hide entire soc computers complete with network adapters.

        There is also the matter of retraining on an institutional scale, and if you think it’s as simple as “put this into the computer, not that” you’re woefully underinformed.

        Just as an aside, it’s pretty fraught to compare a language transition caused by centuries of forced resettlement to switching the kind of computer thingy government employees use over the course of two years.