• grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        SCOTUS already effectively made him a king. The notion that we’ve got only four years of drama is incredibly optimistic.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I’m hoping he just keels over by then, he can’t be long for this world at his age and at his health.

          • orclev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Then we get who knows how many years of slightly less dramatic but significantly worse christo-fascist Vance. The US is fucked and it’s going to take a big chunk of the world with it.

            • Stovetop@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Vance lacks the cult of personality, though. With Trump out of the picture, his former loyalists will scramble and turn on one another to fill the power vacuum.

            • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              26
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              10 hours ago

              Guess what‽ It no longer matters what Kamala would have done, she lost the election. Trump has promised to help Israel wipe Gaza off the map to end the war. Since you find his fascist antics entertaining, you’re in for that treat.

              Also, how much time do you save by not typing out “your”?

                • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  19
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 hours ago

                  Nice one, are you actually 12?

                  Our choices were status quo (sending bombs and finger wagging) or fascism (turning Gaza to glass and bulldozing it so that Israel can complete their genocide and take the land for themselves). The country chose fascism. If you’re saying Trump is better in this regard, then you need to work on your critical thinking skills.

                • atlas@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  the whole “fascism is ok as long as it affects me none” is so goddamn tiring.

                  i really hope you never have to experience it, but people like you really do not learn any other way it seems.

                  • The world is an awfull place with bad people doing bad things and good people dying unnessasarilly. U see the way i see the world all people are equal and thus all lives are equal and thus all deaths are equal. Therefore it would logically follow that the thing causing the most death is the primary concern. As of present that would be the 1.8million people dying of the preventable disease tuberculosis every year.

                    The whole “slow painfull death by disease is ok as long as it affects me none” is so goddamn tiring.

        • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          10 hours ago

          That’s not necessarily true. Russia holds elections as well, doesn’t mean they are free and fair.

          It’s pretty naive to think that the US cannot become a de facto non-democratic state.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Like the last couple of elections were free and democratic.

            I guess counting of the votes was.

            But the system is sufficiently rigged already, Russians just don’t bother with such complex mechanisms. Why, when you can just steal. After all, a different kind of people.

            • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I guess counting of the votes was.

              The 2000 and 2004 elections in russia are generally considered free and fair (2004 perhaps less so, but I digress). That didn’t really have an impact later on.

              But the system is sufficiently rigged already, Russians just don’t bother with such complex mechanisms. Why, when you can just steal. After all, a different kind of people.

              While I agree in general, having lived in North America for a decade (including US) and russia for over a decade, you’d be surprised about the similarities in certain (emphasis on certain, not even close to all or even many) elements of “national thinking” in the US and russia. That being said, historically US has had a positive impact in the world. I can’t think of a single thing that russia has done that has had a positive effect (even their much fetishized celebration of WW2 victory is a ruse as the USSR initially sided with the Nazis to split up Europe).

              • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                The 2000 and 2004 elections in russia are generally considered free and fair (2004 perhaps less so, but I digress). That didn’t really have an impact later on.

                I meant 1996. Wide protests, the first election in independent Russia widely put in doubt, but in the West - lots of enthusiasm that the bad thing didn’t happen and those communists didn’t win.

                even their much fetishized celebration of WW2 victory is a ruse as the USSR initially sided with the Nazis to split up Europe

                I disagree. (Sorry for the very long elaboration that follows, but it’s needed, I think. Stalin’s USSR wasn’t nice, but what you said is usually part of the narrative most of which is plainly not true.)

                The Molotov-Ribbentrop pact was a temporary (and very abrupt) change of policy and not what some common narratives make it seem. Soviet propaganda almost since 20s and till that short period actually portrayed Germans in some form as the main potential enemy.

                Those Baltic countries USSR swallowed were typical fascist regimes, just small. Military aggression is not nice, but the narrative people from the Baltics love now, about how USSR was “worse than the Nazis” - well, very few Baltic Jews survived, I guess that makes their position consistent with reality, but doesn’t sell it very well to me.

                Parts of Poland annexed were Western Ukraine and Western Belarus, and Wilno which is now part of Lithuania. And no, Polish Republic of that time wasn’t very minority-friendly. Again, not as clear-cut. There Soviet troops were really welcomed in 1939.

                Even the Winter War was preceded by repeated offers of similar or bigger amount of territory given to Finland by USSR in exchange for what it asked, and what it asked was the really necessary territory to make Leningrad defensible from the Finnish side. It was not as barbaric and aggressive as the common narratives say as well. Karl Gustav Mannerheim, if you know who that is, not only supported accepting the deal, but was in favor of some concessions more than the minimum that USSR demanded. And after the war, forcing its victory, USSR took no more than that.

                And Soviet Union did pay the biggest human cost of those fighting in Europe.

                The fetish is disgusting, of course, and also anachronistic - there were no regular parades initially in celebration of that war ending, only those on November 7, and of course nobody was enthusiastic about an opportunity to “repeat it”. It was a hungry ruined country with disabled veterans in poverty, gangs of orphans, years of darkness and despair, one can say. The years between end of the war and Stalin’s death are not really remembered for anything other than that.

                Actually for all the Cold War the USSR’s propaganda position was that it wants only peace and united humanity, and the people who want to “repeat” something are on the other side. I’d say that during the first Indochina war and even later this was, well, true.

                • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 hours ago

                  I am Ukrainian. So let’s just say you won’t convince me of the uncle Stalin coming to liberate eastern Europe BS narrative. I would like to invite you and your family to try and speak Ukrainian in the occupied territories.

                  A strong majority of russian are genocidal imperialists. Not because of any inherent qualities, it’s the choices they make.

                  I will just add that the russians should take ownership of the outcomes in their history (not just 1996 election, but more generally). They are not children and they need to take responsibility without looking for scapegoats as they always do.

                  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    5 hours ago

                    I am Ukrainian. So let’s just say you won’t convince me of the uncle Stalin coming to liberate eastern Europe BS narrative. I would you and your family to try and speak Ukrainian in the occupied territories.

                    Ukrainian language was not in any way suppressed in the USSR at any point. My grandmother happens to be from Ukraine.

                    It was less prestigious, because of technical education being given in Russian and the “distribution” system after university, where graduates were being directed to workplaces all over the union.

                    If you mean these days, I don’t think there’s been a vote on invading Ukraine.

                    A strong majority of russian are genocidal imperialists. Not because of any inherent qualities, it’s the choices they make.

                    Well, since you’ve pulled some Ukrainian roots for your position, I’ll say that I’m Armenian and those Ukrainians I’ve met who’d open their mouth on Artsakh did not lead me to believe that Ukrainians make better choices (and they can stick whatever they call “international law” where sun don’t shine, if that set of rules in their opinion makes a land consistently Armenian since before Slavs made it into written history and till now to be Azeri, because in USSR someone decided so and some bastards “recognized” it as such).

                    I will just add that the russians should take ownership of the outcomes in their history (not just 1996 election, but more generally). They are not children and they need to take responsibility without looking for scapegoats as they always do.

                    Do you do the same in full for every identity you apply to yourself? If not, then why are you giving advice to Russians?

            • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              I think your confidence in this is exactly why it can happen.

              This is not some sort of secret knowledge, the topic of democracies sliding into de facto authoritarianism is a well researched topic.

              And the mode by which this happens is often slow and steady, largely driven by complacency and corruption.

              • The first step towards authoritarian is the revocation of free speach. The only people trying to control that as of present are the left. Ill start listening to what u have to say the second trump bans people speaking their minds in public or puts american citizens people in concentration camps.

                • atlas@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  if you don’t remember, let me refresh your memory; trump was calling news outlets he didn’t agree with as “fake news”, and even went as far as kicking them out of press conferences in favour of his “approved” journalists.

                  undermining journalism is how your boy hitler started to rise to power.

                  if you don’t consider that an impingement on free speech, and you’d rather wait until he does it to the rest of the citizens, then i really have no more words for you.

                  • Free speach is everyone right (yes even the people u dont like) trump can call whoever he wants fake news thats him exercising his free speach.

                    He can kick em out thats not violating their right to write and say whatever the fuck they want.

                    Would you consider the government asking twitter to kindly remove a true story from circulation because it would reflect negatively on said stories fathers political endeavours a violation of frew speach or ellection interference?

                • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 hours ago

                  Why do you think there would a formal revocation of free speech if US did slide into authoritarian, non-democratic rule? This seems counter inuitive. Why bring attention to such a topic if your goal is limiting free speech, surely you would use other more subtle methods to achieve such a goal (again this topic is well researched and you can easily find out how it works if you are actually acting in good faith). Russia (and I believe even China) formally has free speech.

                  And what makes you think people in the US would oppose trump jailing political opponents (or let alone have the capability do anything about it)? No one is going to openly say that person X is going to jail because he opposes Trump/his backers. You would find some other reason that is easy to market to local plebs? No?

                  Am I being unreasonable in my line of thinking?

                  • Why do you think there would a formal revocation of free speech if US did slide into authoritarian, non-democratic rule? This seems counter inuitive. Why bring attention to such a topic if your goal is limiting free speech, surely you would use other more subtle methods to achieve such a goal (again this topic is well researched and you can easily find out how it works if you are actually acting in good faith). Russia (and I believe even China) formally has free speech.

                    Exactly u would be way morw subtle like pressuring all the social media sites where a majority of conversation takes place to remove certain information.

                    And what makes you think people in the US would oppose trump jailing political opponents (or let alone have the capability do anything about it)? No one is going to openly say that person X is going to jail because he opposes Trump/his backers. You would find some other reason that is easy to market to local plebs? No?

                    What do u think trumps felonies are? Attempts to jail a political opponent? Righfully earned for hiding the fact he paid of a hooker? Didnt Arnold Schwarzenegger do the same thing?

                    Am I being unreasonable in my line of thinking?

                    Not at all u just need to make the final connection

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Maybe not about elections, per se, but I think you forgot what happened between 2016 to 2020. Almost every day news headlines were like “Trump tweets dumb thing”, “Trump announces dumb thing”, “Trump does dumb thing”. This election period was quieter on the scale of things compared to then, and we’re headed right back for it.