• beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The decentralized nature of federated social media is the only advantage it has. But it’s kind of a wash. The big social media platforms have resources and weight they can throw at resisting state level surveillance. The operator of the Mastodon instance you sign up for probably doesn’t have a lawyer on retainer let alone the army of legal experts Facebook or X could throw at the problem. That said you can always change instances or use multiple ones to begin with.

    • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Sure, there are things you can do to be safe on Lemmy/the fediverse, but most of those things aren’t inherent to the platform, they’re just good safety practices, and most importantly none of them are mentioned in this “PSA” about “safety”.

      • beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I don’t disagree with you. Realistically if you’re serious about security and a state level actor is in your threat model, you probably shouldn’t be using social media at all, but especially not platforms that focus on followers and public posts rather than one-on-one or small group connections. At least not for day to day usage.