• morgan423@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Honestly, Google did this to themselves with not properly vetting the advertisers that they sell space to, and with oversaturation of ads.

    If they’d have stopped granting ad space to scammers and malware spreaders, and if they’d have stopped adding advertisements at the line most people find tolerable (which seems to be a single ad between videos… not multiple at a time, and certainly no mid-rolls), they wouldn’t have triggered quite the level of ad blocking that they did.

    I see this “problem” that they have as being entirely of their own making.

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Unlock origin is the adblocker that people are installing. There are a lot of people with shitty adblockers out there, I guess they are switching.

  • Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    These tech companies have underestimated their utility. They are mostly providing mindless time wasters. If you try to charge money or create inconvenience, people will look for something else to do.

    Their attention is your lifeblood, and you’re actively giving them reasons to look elsewhere. The VC grow-at-all-costs business model is fundamentally flawed. It doesn’t scale when profitability becomes a priority.

  • ohlaph@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    After YouTube started filling their search results with mostly shorts, I stopped using it for new stuff. It’s terrible now.

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah youtubes attempt at being tiktok is just awful and they don’t even have options to not have shorts show up in the feed. On top of shorts just being inferior versions of regular videos without functional controls

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        This is what gets me. Wanna show me shorts? Ok. But why the fuck am I not allowed to rewind a couple of seconds if I want to? It’s an artificial, completely useless limitation that had no place in 2023.

        So, no thanks.

        • Turun@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          For what it’s worth you can replace the “short” in the url with “watch” to get the old interface back.

  • chakan2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I just wonder how much of Chome’s browser share Google is willing to lose over this.

    • Goku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Make sure to turn off telemetry and adjust your browser’s DNS settings.

          • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            Care to share where to read up on DNS and what it does, not that tech savy when it comes to networks.

            • λλλ@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              Dns is what translates urls (google.com, lemmy.world, etc) into ip addresses (207.94.56.21) which your computer can actually understand. Dns can be used to track you but a good dns can also very slightly speed up your Internet because it gets you the address to websites a bit faster. I use adguard and have Cloudflare DNS upstream from that

              • Inductor@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                I’d like to elaborate a bit on why DNS can be used to track you.

                Nearly all web traffic is encrypted (https), you can check by looking at the padlock next to the URL in your browser. But DNS requests aren’t encrypted by default. This means anyone, most likely your ISP our the admin of your home network, can see what domains you’re accessing. That means just google.com, lemmy.world, etc. and not lemmy.world/post/… This isn’t a huge amount of info, but it does tell anyone who’s looking approximately what you’re doing (googling something, looking at lemmy, etc.).

                To fix that there are a few different ways to encrypt DNS requests, the most common of which (afaik) is DNS over HTTPS, which will encrypt DNS requests like any other web request your browser makes. I don’t know why this hasn’t been made the default yet. Firefox has a setting for DNS over HTTPS, it calls it secure DNS.

  • Tygr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Didn’t know about SponsorBlock until all this started. So many just found out ad blocking is possible.

    • LUHG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Sponsor block is a different beast. Should we really be doing that to our content creators? No, definitely not. Is it them or the advertising company that suffers?

      Edit: Actually really surprised about this. Couple weeks ago people are sticking up for YT premium prices. Now, you are against helping the creators you watch.

      • kratoz29@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Huh, Sponsorblock is basically muting TV ads like in the old days.

        Why should I be forced to watch a sponsor almost always totally unrelated to the content I seek to watch, and that the YouTuber decided to upload?

          • Kevin@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            He did eventually take one later on, which I can imagine must’ve been a bit of a painful decision ;-;

            • Turun@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              He declined the first one, because they wanted him to lie.

              He accepted the other, because they were fine with just facts.

              A VPN doesn’t protect your privacy. It only helps on websites without working https, which is ridiculously rare these days. Yes, it also hides your IP address, but that is really really irrelevant. If you wanted to stay truly anonymous you’d not log in anywhere and use Tor. The only actual use case is circumventing geo blocking.

  • WindowsEnjoyer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    They should fucking do an experiment - 2€/$ a month for an ad-free subscription and 3€/$ a month for higher video quality+no ads subscription. I would fucking pour my money into it.

    Oh wait, that would not solve lack of sponsorblock. I guess I am not interested then…

    • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      2€/$ a month for an ad-free subscription and 3€/$ a month for higher video quality+no ads subscription

      sponsorblock

      This is basically Nebula lol, minus the video quality tiering

      • sic_1@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Nebula is pretty awesome and the type of content is great. I miss some light entertainment content though, so the network effect is at work. Still, nebula is the only streaming platform I’d consider subscribing as their policy is great and they do provide good value.

  • Zacryon@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    There’s also the option of biting the bullet and paying for YouTube Premium.

    No. Never. I’d rather stop using YT at all than giving in to coerced user-tracking.

    • NoRodent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I mean, I might have considered paying for YT premium if I thought it offered some value (other than disabling ads) but I won’t sure as hell pay for anything that any company is trying to blackmail me into.

      • pascal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        I use it because YouTube music is included and it’s great while driving, it allows background play even with the screen off (I’m talking about mobile).

        There’s something more, but nothing that a pro user cannot already do with third tools.

        • Zacryon@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I find it funny how sometimes apps “create value” by taking something away which is included by default in similar products and goes without saying.

          In this context: YouTube is the only app I know which is denying to work when put into background or with the screen off.

          Or take some car manufacturers who start asking for a fee just to use basic functionality.