Live coverage thread of the International Court of Justice and the case of South Africa vs. Israel.

  • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    They didn’t really call for it to stop military action though. They called for it to stop doing things intended to be genocide; I predict that Israel will just disagree that it intends genocide, and keep on doing it.

  • Oliofizodos@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Expected and disappointing statement. This just backs the non-statement of saying Israel should “do what it can” to protect civilians. The simplest way to protect civilians is to order an immediate ceasefire. This will help Biden to continue supporting the genocidal campaign that Israel is conducting on the Palestinians, because nothing he says opposes the ICJ.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’d add, I’m not happy with the “yeah, come back in a month” phrasing. Israel could see that as “Oh, so as long as we finish this in a month…?”

      • Oliofizodos@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah absolutely, since their wording is so vague there’s not really a bar that they would need to meet.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I mean, the ICJ is organized and maintained by the UN, so it makes sense that a “strong response” from them effectively amounts to hand-wringing.