Furniture giant IKEA has agreed to pay 6 million euros ($6.5 million) towards a government fund compensating victims of forced labor under Germany’s communist dictatorship, in a move campaigners hope will pressure other companies to follow.

  • RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    “After it became known that the company was involved in forced prison labor, IKEA accepted our invitation to talk.”

    So from the sound of it IKEA didn’t give two shits as long as no one knew, just like any other big company. You cannot tell me that people at IKEA simply didn’t know, someone knew.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Pretty much everyone knew but OTOH it’s not like they were making contracts with prisons, they had contracts with ordinary GDR companies which used prison labour to supplement their own workforce, often on an irregular basis. E.g. if you had a contract with a GDR company to supply a certain number of t-shirts per month for three years, they’d do it with their own workforce, they’d get another short-term contract and fulfil part of that and part of your contract with prison labour. The whole economy was infested with it, basically impossible to do business with the GDR and not have prison labour involved somewhere in the supply chain. What are you expecting, you’re doing business with tankies.

      I’d see stronger culpability if they had been contracting out dangerous work. GDR wasn’t stellar at work safety in general, not atrocious either, but prison labour in e.g. the chemical industry? It’s not that they didn’t gave a fuck, it was extra unsafe by design.

    • Successful_Try543
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      Of course they knew. For Ingvar Kamprad, it was all about saving money. No matter what.

    • federal reverseM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      I am sure Ikea will acknowledge having contributed to illegal deforestation of original forests in Romania, Belarus, and Russia in the 2020s at some point, too.

  • Imhotep@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    This was slavery, in the eighties, and Ikea figured they could benefit from it (they 100% knew) and save what I suppose was an absurd amount of money

    40 years later they pay 6 millions

    I know many corporations are awful but we should’t become desensitized. How can you still shop there knowing this

    • ridago@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because they are currently the only company acknowledging their fault? Boycotting them while ignoring all the other companies benefiting from the exact same practice seems counterproductive…

      • Imhotep@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        They didn’t reveal the information, the former prisoners first shone light on it when they asked for compensation.
        They only felt like they had to make amends once the story came out, not during the 30 years prior. strange how that goes

        Take control of the narrative.

        Pay a research group to confirm what has already been revealed. On the wikipedia page it almost seems like the whole thing was their idea

        (from a quick search this was revealed in 2011 by a german media, opening Stasi files)

        And it works too

    • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This is in no way a defense, but rather an accusation: many other companies pull or have pulled similar things. Hasbro famously used near slave labor when they partnered with Good Shepherd Sisters, one of many similar “Magdalene Laundries”; religious convents that some women were put in for sins as horrifying as “having a baby out of wedlock.”

      Behind the Bastards discusses them in their episodes titled “How the catholic church murdered Ireland’s babies”

    • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s s bit different when you do forced labour for actual crimes and not just because you had an opinion. Disagreeing with the government is not the same as rape and murder. These germans were sentenced to life for belieiving in modern rights.

      Actual crimes, as in manslaughter, rape, stealing from another.

      • B0rax
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        No. It is not different. Nobody should be forced to do Labour. Prisons are not supposed to be money making machines. Prisons are supposed to reintegrate people into society. But I guess the US has not heard about that.

        • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          If you run over children with your car and have to fix potholes for 8 yeara, that’s ok in my books. Having to do that because you think women should be able to vote IS different.

          But that’s merely my opinion and fits my world view perfectly

          And it’s not about making money, it’s about having consiquenses. The prisoner working has a guard (at least where I live) whose pay is more than what the convict makes.

          • B0rax
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Again. It should not be about punishment but about re-socializing.

            At least in theory.

            • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Part of resocialising is that you get to meet your demons daily. I’m from Finland and our system has one of the highest success rates in the world.

              You downvoting me makes it seem like you’d prefer to coddle someone that chose harm, and I find that apalling.

              • B0rax
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I did, in fact, not downvote you.

      • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Right, we only do forced labour for people who smoke weed, which is morally superior.

          • jenesaisquoi
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Like providing health care to women?

            You see, people are pointing this out because what is and isn’t a crime changes over time. Slavery however is always bad. Hence we should never enslave people.

            • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              What is and isn’t a crime that lands you hard time or civic duty hasn’t really changed much at all during modern times, at least in Finland.

              When they do, the consequences change with them.

              For exmple having a repeat DUI person clean roadsides is a great way to rehabilitate.

      • Saleh
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Who gets to decide what “actual crimes” are and what aren’t? For instance in Germany for good reason hate speech is forbidden and in rare cases can put you in prison. By US standards inconceivable. Meanwhile in the US people are coerced into plea deals for crimes they didnt commit, or get mandatory minimum sentences for drug posession in small quantities.

        • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t think anyone with a relatively good conscience thinks The US has it right. Luckily they are only 3% percent of the world.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        So make having an opinion a crime and it’s fine?

        • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, a few hundred thousand more than e.g. China. That’s if you don’t count the 11 milloin Uyghurs in what can only be called concentration camps.

  • polluteyourjorts@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    At first glance I thought this was satirical, implying ikea was fined for making people build their own furniture.