• GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Because they prop up the infra to support them right?

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        “it seems so backwards”

        They set the shit up, so they decided the behaviors.

        • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Yes, it is rather backwards for a handful of companies to own entire blocks of IP addresses just because. The infrastructure was massively funded by public dollars, it should be publicly owned.

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            A fair point indeed, but that’s not how it is. Public dollars were funneled one-way into private infra, in many cases.

            • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              15 hours ago

              but that’s not how it is

              Doesn’t mean it can’t be that way, though, One way nationalization also exists.

              • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                The world runs on contacts, and those dollars were spent around the globe. There are examples of what you say, with mali considering reclaiming ml. Nationalization can have a chilling effect on industry, but depending on your affiliations this isn’t really an issue