I’m not saying the worst, otherwise I would need to include the star wars sequels or transformers movies… Just some really dumb movie that somehow got praised.

For me has to be Ready Player One. That movie message is so “uhuh” obvious that is stupid, the whole nerd that saves the world in a thing that otherwise would be useless to know in real life… The so over the top evil gaming corporation. The whole 80s and 90s movies and games references get old after half an hour… And it’s so pandering towards the geeks and nerds, they really want the viewer feeling really cool for knowing that is the Shining hallway, or that is a Monty python reference… Or look a GUNDAM! YOU’RE SO COOL FOR COLLECTING THOSE GUN PLA! Look we have also overwatch and halo in the background! You’re so cool modern gamer!

Also the obviously attractive “nerd” hacker girl that thinks she’s ugly and deformed for having a small hard to see red tint in one side of her pretty face… Cmon man. In no universe anyone would think that actress is ugly.

And the message at the end is so hilarious: Look man, you’re cool for getting these references and being a real gamer is cool, but go outside more!

Is like the creators have no self awareness.

      • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I’m biased but I thought it was pretty clear with portraying Truman as an unambiguously bad guy and Oppenheimer as decent but failing at a critical moment and then regretting it later

        • bunkyprewster@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’ve always imagined his moral dilemma was knowing that (after the Nazis were defeated) going ahead with the bomb was wrong, but wanting to do it anyway - because they had become so invested in the idea, and wanted to see if they could.

    • Toribor@corndog.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’d been pretty eager to see it. Everyone told me how intense it was, I actually put it off for a little while because I wasn’t sure I was in the mood for something really bleak and existential.

      Watching it I was like oh okay this is a movie. Not bad but I wouldn’t call it an intense experience.

  • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    La La Land. Musicals are already on thin ice, but a musical about some arrogant, self obsessed people complaining about how hard it is trying to be (and ultimately succeeding in being) successful?? UGH. Shut it all down.

    • CyberMonkey404@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Right?! “Oh no we are so brilliant and talented and smoking hot, but the world won’t just give us success on a silver platter and now that we made our dreams come true we miss being together”.

  • onlooker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    James Cameron’s Titanic. It’s marketed as a romantic film, but the moment you start looking at other aspects of the movie, it just seems stupid. The antagonist is so cartoonishly evil, it’s a wonder they didn’t give him a mustache to twirl.

    And then there’s the ending. Oh dear lord, the ending. Spoiler warning and all that: at the end of the movie, The Titanic s(t)inks and the passengers try to get to safety. Rose finds a floating door or something to stay afloat and finds Jack swimming in the freezing ocean. Then Jack makes the most non-sensical decision in the entire movie: he sacrifices his own life for no good reason. The plot frames it as a necessary sacrifice, but it totally IS unnecessary, because there was enough room on the stupid door for two people. And then we flash forward to the present, where Rose is old, but still has that gem she wore throughout the movie… and then she tosses it into the ocean. WHY.

    Basically the plot boils down to: two young people have a fling on a boat and then the boat sinks. It absolutely did NOT deserve all those academy awards it got that year.

    • EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      People are STILL bringing up the “there’s enough room” arguments?

      The movie LITERALLY shows you why it doesn’t work. At first they both try to climb on it, but they’re too heavy and the stupid thing capsizes. Only then is Jack like “You go take it, Imma good”

      Also, Mythbusters tried it and got the same results. 2 people to heavy, 1 ok.

      • grrk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        No, the Mythbusters actually proved the door could support two people. At the end James Cameron himself basically throws his hands up, concedes and makes some comment about “whatever, if the script says Jack has to die, Jack is dying.” Rewatch the edpisode if ya don’t believe me

        • EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yes, after the took off their lifebelts and tied them under the door for adden buoyancy.

          I think two people, already stressed to their teeth, now also suffering from hypothermia can be forgiven for not having the same presence of mind in that situation

  • salarua@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Aquaman. the visual effects were ridiculous, the characters were one-dimensional, the soundtrack was…something, and the overall tone was that of a testosterone firehose to the face. i said the eight deadly words about halfway through, and i was thoroughly bored out of my mind despite action scene after action scene after action scene…the only reason why i didn’t just get up and leave was because i was watching with a group

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      My god, even among DC movies, that was such a steaming pile of shit. And so what did they do? They made a sequel.

      (Hey, I like DC movies. I really enjoyed The Flash, and I liked the Superman v. Batman, with Batfleck. So for me to say Aquaman was a turd in a punchbowl means something.)

    • Brutticus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Sometimes I wish Hollywood still made lower budget movies, because this felt like it needed a lesser production value. Jason Momoa knew what kind of movie it was.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m reliably informed there are people who like Michael Bay’s Transformers movies. The most interesting part of the entire series to me was watching a Camaro get into a literal fist fight with a Mustang. Otherwise my memories of the movie were having eye rollingly childish catch phrases boomed down at me, or visuals that are basically just technicolor television snow.

    • Bronzefish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      No like is the wrong word. I love them. Don’t know why thou, they are fucking stupid.
      I mean its clearly an ad for the military where cars beat up cars. Buuuut Its hilariously epic and very comforting in its shallowness. Normally I am more of a weird indie movie guy. But every time optimus calls out all autobots in the end I cry.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    The Purge. They’re all dumb as fuck. “No lawz fur wun day. Halps soseyetti.”

    Yeah no, trust in the government would break the floor and anarchy would reign instead. Not to mention businesses would probably refuse to operate here.

    • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Don’t get me stated on how fucking dumb it is that everyone everywhere just immediately turns to murder. Crime isn’t something I have a problem with, so when I say I’ve never committed a murder it’s not because the pesky laws are stopping me. I just genuinely don’t see the need to kill someone. But no, everyone and their mom is going full zodiac all day all night if it went for laws!

      • Zahille7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s a plot point in the prequel one (I’ve only seen the first one, though) and from one of the trailers I remember seeing, during the very first Purge people were just throwing huge parties and getting all kinds of fucked up, and the people on charge were disappointed because they just wanted people to kill each other.

        It was posed as some sort of secret government conspiracy to keep the population/minorities/what have you “in check.”

  • harsh3466@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    For me, it was A Quiet Place. I found it incredibly dumb and impossible to believe that nobody on the whole of the planet ever considered that these aliens with ultra incredible hearing weren’t somehow vulnerable to noise? Just dumb as fuck, especially when you consider that sonic weapons already exist and are used, and sound is routinely used in torture/incarceration scenarios.

    • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Eh, I think of it more in the vein of It Follows. It’s not supposed to make sense, it’s supposed to be a minigame for the audience to play along with the characters. It lays out a simple set of mechanics and then uses that to build tense dilemmas, giving the audience a chance to think about what they would do in that situation, and what they definitely want to prevent from happening.

      I didn’t see the second one, though. Heard it wasn’t great (no pun intended).

  • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I worked on the space shuttle program, and I found Armageddon almost unwatchable. I mean, those things go up with the big solid rockets and an external tank full of hydrogen and oxygen, all of which get jettisoned during launch, then they come down as a glider. But in the movie they’re landing on asteroids and taking off again, smashing into things and still flying, etc. (remember how Columbia blew up because of a crack in the leading edge of one wing?). Plus the whole premise of it being easier to teach oil drillers how to be astronauts than to teach astronauts how to be oil drillers is a joke. Every astronaut I’ve met has been an amazing capable person - many are test pilots with multiple advanced degrees.

    • Zahille7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I always love the interview with Ben Affleck about Armageddon: “I asked Micheal why it would be easier to train drillers to be astronauts rather than vice versa, and he just responded with ‘fuck you.’”

      • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Ha! I hadn’t heard that - I’m glad someone involved called him out on it. I mean, I get that the real answer - to that and all my complaints - is that the movie doesn’t work otherwise, but it’s so annoying.

    • norimee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      As soon as you know too much about a certain topic, any movie or series about it turns to shit.

      I’m a nurse and badly done medical stuff in movies are so rampant and it drives me crazy.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s super true. What’s worse is that it often turns out to be true of news as well. There have been a few times when I was familiar with events that made the news, and there were always inaccuracies in the articles. It’s made me look at articles on events that I’m not familiar with differently; they probably have the same amount of inaccuracies.

        I’m software engineering in aerospace, so a lot of computer and space stuff is ruined, which covers a lot of content.

        But everyone should smack their heads about Armageddon.

    • Toribor@corndog.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Astronauts brains are too big, their soft womanly hands incapable of drilling. Wearing a spacesuit and floating around a bit is trivial. Only some yeehaw boys and one man who ‘tells it like it is’ can save us.

    • CYB3R@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m sorry but I ADORE Armageddon lol is very emotional and self aware. Is definitely a NO BORING movie and always keeps moving, even when there’s no explosions going on. Ben Affleck > Neil Armstrong, I bet he couldn’t had reached those 400 feet in time! 💣

  • halfeatenpotato@lonestarlemmy.mooo.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Barbie.

    I like Margot Robbie. I like Ryan Gosling. I like fun movies. But idk, it just didn’t really appeal to me, and the plot felt predictable. I don’t regret watching it necessarily, but I also have no interest in watching it again.

      • gjoel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I was so confused about the message… Ken went full patriarchy, but then demonstrated that it wasn’t really that bad (also, no horses). So compared to barbieland the real world is absolutely paradise. Then they flip the full-on matriarchal barbieland to complete patriarchy, find that the women don’t like that, do a bit of gender war and go mostly matriarchy because reasons. And than a bitter remark that women have it hard in the real world so men will have it hard in barbieland. It’s all over the place.

        The weird pacing, jokes that fall flat and at one point goes all 3 stooges just left me feeling… Empty, afterwards. All that hype, all the people rooting for and against it, people complaining that it didn’t win all the awards… I thought it was a vapid, low quality summer movie.

    • CYB3R@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The constant attack towards men ruined that movie, it wasn’t even a clever attack just dumb feminism

      • InputZero@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        While I do agree that it, at times, definitely stepped into ‘dumb femminism’ as you put it. I also acknowledge that it was a movie and to do a discussion on feminism justice it would require a lot more than 2 hours. So a lot got simplified, sometimes too much. I disagree with you that it was a constant attack towards men. The movie went wayyyyy out of its way to make it clear they were attacking patriarchal systems, not men in general. That’s Ken’s whole arc, he’s suffering under patriarchy too. He just also gets the benefits of the patruarchy while he’s suffering. If I had any criticism about the film it was how much it tried to avoid criticizing capitalism and corporate culture’s role.

        • CYB3R@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Nah I’m sorry but it was an aimed attack. The speech about what society expects from a woman is such bullshit. As a man that is very old school I don’t need woman to look great for me but not enough for other men, or being delicate, or earning less and all that stupidity. The men were the villain in the movie and the butt of the joke…

          And the Ken character was fine. Only at the very end was almost shoehorned the “oh actually the system is the problem” and wtf didn’t he got Barbie at the end, she even wanted him at first. Now that he was a better person or whatever why they went separate ways? There’s no satisfactory ending for neither of the characters.

    • Xer0@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Barbie movie Predictable

      Were you expecting a post-modern masterpiece?

  • ganksy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Guardians of the galaxy 3. Would not be surprised to learn ChatGPT wrote the dialogue.

    • Plum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Thor: Love and Thunder felt like it was written by a Disney executive suite after they ran metrics on what test groups laughed at in Taika’s other work, then amplified the lulz by 20%, and rewrote it for the 11-16 year old market.

      • Itrytoblenderrender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I had the feeling that they tried to merge a dark drama and a slapstick comedy into one movie.

        The God killer, especially the intro was quite interesting and dark. I could relate with his anger, disappointment and urge for vengeance.

  • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The Matrix. So, so dumb. Dumb, lots of dumb.

    Absolutely the most overhyped film I’ve ever paid money to see.

    • krolden@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Using people as batteries never made sense since you’d have to continually use energy to feed them and they really dont make that much heat energy.

      • Iapar@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        If I remember correctly in the first drafts they used the brain for computational power but went for the battery idea because it was, for a then tech illiterate audience, easier to understand.

    • Plum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I was old enough to see the original trilogy re-released with all the bad dumb filler George Lucas thought was necessary to complete his vision.

      All the poopy squelchy gross-out CGI was obviously a crass moneygrab, but it seemed like such a reflection of the man himself that I boycotted the prequels when they came out. Then I found Red Letter Media. Fuck the prequels. Fuck that creepy bastard. Han shot only.

      • CYB3R@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        The prequels had the best light saber fights in the franchise though.

        • tobogganablaze@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I guess they look prettier. But they are boring AF. There is no tension or stakes between the characters because they’re all boring or unlikable and it’s so highly choreographed it looks like dance number from a musical.

          Yeah, OT lightsaber fights lacked action. But at least they had weight and meaning behind them. That makes them much, much better in my opinion.

          • CYB3R@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            They’re lightsabers wtf would they need weight lmao

            Look, George Lucas wanted Wu xia style movies with space samurais and the choreography did that PERFECTLY. Is supposed to look like a dance, have you seen HERO or crouching tiger hidden dragon?

            The Disney sequels tried to do a more “realistic” style, I bet inspired by John Wick or the bourne movies but with “swords” but failed, the mistakes can be seen during the choreography. I can’t remember a single mistake being noticeable during the prequel fights.

            • tobogganablaze@lemmus.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Ok, so you clearly only care about the action scenes and don’t care about the story at all. Guess that’s a view point that exists.

              • CYB3R@lemm.eeOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Anakin vs Obi wan was a visual spectacle and still one of most emotional fights in the series… And it’s in the prequel. I rest in my case.

      • Xer0@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Honestly, now that I’ve watched them more recently I enjoyed them a ton. At least Lucas had an idea of where he wanted to go with it, unlike the shit Disney trilogy.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Aeons ago, I came across a picture of a young woman in a “steampunk Elsa” cosplay. It was “steam punk” because she had brown leather straps with brass buckles everywhere and she was wearing a pair of goggles like a hat. It was “Elsa” because the cloth parts of her bustier was cyan.

          Feels reductive, right? That a genre of fiction with themes and ideas to explore, and a main character from a major motion picture, both get boiled down to some leather straps and colored cloth.

          That’s what Disney did to Star Wars. It’s not a story anymore, it’s a cosplay aesthetic.

      • tobogganablaze@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Oh, yes the special edition re-release … where all the guns have been replaced by walkie-talkies and the word Wookie has been change to “hair challenged animal”.

        The Plinkett reviews are probably the best thing that came from the prequels! I must have watched them more often then the actual movies by now.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve recently come to terms with the fact that I guess I’ve just grown out of Star Wars. When you strip away all of the nostalgia, I don’t think any of the originals (or prequels) hold up at all. And the newer ones have just been trash.

      • tobogganablaze@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’ve recently come to terms with the fact that I guess I’ve just grown out of Star Wars. When you strip away all of the nostalgia

        Very true. Rewatching stuff later with a new perspective certainly changes things.

        I don’t think any of the originals (or prequels) hold up at all.

        That is where I disagree. THe orginals do hold up, because Starwars was about classic adventure story. The character of Luke Skywalker. The original trilogoy (and there are quality differences between the eopisodes) overall get this right. It’s the sort of timless story, just with a spin on it beeing a sci-fi world.

        The prequels and sequels completley missed that aspect of basic stoytelling. The OT stands out as a piece of revolutionary cinema, where the prequels are an elaborate ad to sell more Starwars toys.

        • CYB3R@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Does that mean that from your point of view all the movies are evil?

          • tobogganablaze@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Not sure what you mean by that.

            I can offer you bad, terrible, aweful, dreadful, horrendous, vile, digusting … but I wouldn’t say evil.

  • multifariace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The first Harry Potter was okay, but it just got worse. I’d say the worst was Goblet of Fire. That one should top my list of worst overrated movies.

    • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Haha yeah goblet of fire was such an odd movie. I don’t even remember the books or if it was the same but that movie made no sense.

      My favourite part is how they let these kids fight dangerous dragons, one only didn’t drown because harry broke the rules. They kept saying how dangerous it was, but then at the end everyone was shocked that cedric died. A dead child in the child murder games? That is crazy

      • CYB3R@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Remember, the movie is based on a book written by a women who didn’t had high education and is a book for children… Most things about the universe make no sense.