• schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Just shows that there’s no such thing as neutrality on anything contentious (wikis are in any case systemically unsuitable for contentious issues). Even when and how often to mention indisputably true things can be a form of taking sides.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 minute ago

      There’s a difference between literal truth and contextual honesty.

      People only point out that the Gazan health ministry is de jure “Hamas-run” (even though the biggest hospitals are run by the UN, just like the education system) to discredit it’s death tolls and justify the bombings of hospitals by making people associate it with the one thing even the most ignorant know Hamas does; terrorism.

      It’s the equivalent of a red hat fascist calling it “Democrat-run FEMA” or a red armband fascist (the two are far from mutually exclusive btw) the “Jew-run IDF”.