On Friday, the Washington Post’s publisher, Will Lewis, announced that the paper would no longer make endorsements for president—after its journalists had already drafted an endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris. The decision was made by Jeff Bezos, the paper’s owner.

Over a period of several weeks, a Post staffer told me, two Post board members, Charles Lane and Stephen W. Stromberg, had worked on drafts of a Harris endorsement. (Neither was contacted for this article.) “Normally we’d have had a meeting, review a draft, make suggestions, do editing,” the staffer told me. Editorial writers started to feel angsty a few weeks ago, per the staffer; the process stalled. Around a week ago, editorial page editor David Shipley told the editorial board that the endorsement was on track, adding that “this is obviously something our owner has an interest in.”

“We thought we were dickering over language—not over whether there would be an endorsement,” the Post staffer said. So journalists at the Post, in both the news and opinion departments, were stunned Friday after Shipley told the editorial board at a meeting that it would not take a position after all. This represents the first time the Post has sat out a presidential endorsement since 1988.

    • Spezi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      Not comparable at all.

      In Austria it was the whole country that voted, in Germany it was „only“ a state that represents 2.5% of Germanys population.

      Still concerning, but historically the east of Germany tends to elect way more right wing politicians and it still only makes up 15% of the population in total.

      Im the west of Germany, far right parties have much less voters. Still too many, but not enough to put them in a position where they can get into power.