• SparrowHawk@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    10 hours ago

    But it does. Cigarettes were healthy and climate change didn’t exist 50 years ago

    • Leviathan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Neither of those things were backed by science. Confusing convincing lobbying with science is a problem today was it was then.

    • Draconic NEO@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I mean those things didn’t change, it was just about how research was manipulated by money and human biases.

      • SparrowHawk@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yes but science is a process, not a thing, and that process is corruptible.

        There is a differentiation between the natural world for how it’s made and the human process that quantifies that knowledge.

        Science has always changed, just like human culture did

      • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The truth doesn’t change. Scientific consensus does. Scientific consensus has been wrong on countless things. After all, science is about getting things a little less wrong every time.