Fiat126@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 18 hours agosocial media rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1593arrow-down18
arrow-up1585arrow-down1imagesocial media rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneFiat126@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 18 hours agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squareTxzK@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up96arrow-down1·17 hours agoI just love how literary no one involved even acknowledged the existence of Threads lmfao.
minus-squareOrbituary@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26arrow-down10·17 hours agoLiterary or literally? (hint: neither are correct.)
minus-squareswitchboard_pete@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up50arrow-down1·16 hours agoliterally is objectively correct in this context
minus-squarecan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·16 hours agoThe latter is correct, no?
minus-squareVoltage@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·16 hours agoI used to see people having some sort of threads number on their instagram profile, now sometimes i forget that even exists lol
minus-squareFiat126@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·17 hours agoi haven’t heard of anyone actually using it, but I’ve heard of people using the others
I just love how literary no one involved even acknowledged the existence of Threads lmfao.
Literary or literally? (hint: neither are correct.)
literally is objectively correct in this context
Literaryly
The latter is correct, no?
I used to see people having some sort of threads number on their instagram profile, now sometimes i forget that even exists lol
i haven’t heard of anyone actually using it, but I’ve heard of people using the others
… MILF Messenger?
you did 🙀