• Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Sure. But it’s a consequence of monopolisation. Once you break up the monopolies, enshittification will no longer be economically viable.

      • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Monopolization becomes inevitable in a capitalist economy since the wealthy are still the ones with power, and they will always seek to increase their wealth by any means necessary.

        Even in a heavilly regulated form of capitalism, the wealthy will do everything in their power to slowly strip regulations over a period of time where they think people won’t notice and attempt to move public opinion towards the wealthy class’s benefit via propaganda.

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        “You’re not talking about Sprite, but about sugary soft drinks” <- that’s you

          • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I was giving a name to a specific feature of capitalism and you were all “umm actually”-ing me that I’m talking about capitalism.

            That’s like:

            Me: “I really like this chocolate croissant” You: “Actually, you’re talking about a pastry 🤓”

                • irmoz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  By talking about the effect (enshittification) instead of the cause (capitalism). One could read your initial comment and conclude that the only problem is enshittification, and not even think about capitalism as the cause, since you didn’t mention it.

                  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 hours ago

                    I’m giving the name of a process. When someone asks for the title of a book, I don’t start with Guttenberg’s printing press.