• bob_lemon
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The problem is that averaging hue makes no sense at all because hue is not a longest scale.

    If you take a red poster (0) and a blue poster (240), it averages to green. Or take red (0) and red (359), averaging to cyan (180).

    • Starbuncle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 minutes ago

      It would have made more sense if they had shown the distribution of hue as a polar graph and just had one every decade to show how it changes over time.

      • Starbuncle@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 minutes ago

        I wouldn’t trust someone who tried to visualize hue like this to make that calculation correctly.

      • bob_lemon
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 hours ago

        By that logic, the average of red and cyan is both purple and lime. Still useless.

        • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Not if there is a clear trend. If most movie posters are blue, three average will be blue.

          But i agree, it is useless if there is no clear trend.