Five@slrpnk.net to UK Politics@feddit.ukEnglish · 11 hours agoGay man rejected for asylum by Home Office told he is 'not truly gay' by judgemetro.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up161arrow-down14cross-posted to: lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
arrow-up157arrow-down1external-linkGay man rejected for asylum by Home Office told he is 'not truly gay' by judgemetro.co.ukFive@slrpnk.net to UK Politics@feddit.ukEnglish · 11 hours agomessage-square27fedilinkcross-posted to: lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
minus-squareRobotToaster@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down2·10 hours agoI’m not saying he should have to, but is there a reason he can’t just submit, “video evidence”
minus-squaresuperkretlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·edit-26 hours ago“You don’t look like you’re enjoying it enough”
minus-squareMaalus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up15·9 hours agoWas there ever a hetero person seeking asylum that had to give their sex tape to a shitty official?
minus-squareRobotToaster@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 minutes agoHence the “I’m not saying he should have to”. To clarify, I’m asking if there’s some rule or law of evidence that prevents someone doing that.
I’m not saying he should have to, but is there a reason he can’t just submit, “video evidence”
“You don’t look like you’re enjoying it enough”
Was there ever a hetero person seeking asylum that had to give their sex tape to a shitty official?
Hence the “I’m not saying he should have to”. To clarify, I’m asking if there’s some rule or law of evidence that prevents someone doing that.
I mean probably yeah.