mox@lemmy.sdf.org to Programming@programming.dev · 17 days agoThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1197arrow-down12cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.secpp@programming.dev
arrow-up1195arrow-down1external-linkThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.commox@lemmy.sdf.org to Programming@programming.dev · 17 days agomessage-square56fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.secpp@programming.dev
minus-squareTroy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up6·16 days agoThis gets even more complex if you’re using a toolkit of some sort. C++ has a batteries-included way of doing something, then STL has another, and Qt yet another… Etc.
This gets even more complex if you’re using a toolkit of some sort. C++ has a batteries-included way of doing something, then STL has another, and Qt yet another… Etc.