• disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    That’s the implication of the meme.

    I think there are better ways to bring attention to the concerns of climate change than defacing Stonehenge.

    • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      The implication of the meme is that the people talking about how stupid the protests are are actually blind to the very real climate change happening. They might know about it, but they don’t really comprehend that defacing the Stonehenge is nothing compared to it being completely underwater, alongside the whole area.

      Whether the comic is right or wrong is another thing, and the other guy arguing in bad faith is a cunt, but I strongly believe that’s what the comic is meant to portray.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It’s really cool how you decide the opinions and stance of others based on your own opinions. I’m sure you’re always right too.

        I protested with BLM in Yonkers in June of 2020, but I’m sure you’re usually 100% correct otherwise.