• melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Llm’s are not a step to agi. Full stop. Lovelace called this like 200 years ago. Turing and minsky called it in the 40s.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      To create general AI, we first need a way for computers to communicate proficiently with humans.

      LLMs are just that.

        • weker01@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          That is not an argument. Let me demonstrate:

          Humans can’t communicate. They are meat. They are not communicating. It’s literally meat.

          • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Spanish is not English. Its spanish.

            A lot of people are really emotionally invested in this tool being a lot of things it’s not. I think because its kind of the last gasp of pretending capitalism can give us something that isnt shit, the last thing that came out before the end enshitification spiral tightened, nevermind the fact that its largely a cause of that, and I don’t think any of you can be critical or clear headed here.

            I’m afraid we’re too obsessed with it being the bullshit SciFi toy it isnt that we’ll ignore its real use cases, or worse; apply it to its real use cases, completely misunderstand what its doing, and adeptus mechanics our way into getting so fucking many people killed/maimed-those uses are mostly medicine adjacent.

            • weker01@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              I was just pointing out that your emotional plea, that this technology is just autocorrect is not an argument in any way.

              For it to be one you need to explicitly state the implication of that fact. Yes architecturaly it is autocomplete but that does not obviously imply anything. What is it about autocomplete that barrs a system of the ability to understand?

              Humans are made of meat but that does not imply they can’t speak or think.