madthumbs@lemmy.worldM to Linuxsucks@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoWhy botherlemmy.worldimagemessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up122arrow-down157
arrow-up1-35arrow-down1imageWhy botherlemmy.worldmadthumbs@lemmy.worldM to Linuxsucks@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-squarefreewheel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down3·2 months agoWindows is also really good at running kernel-based rootkits disguised as anti cheat. That’s something else Linux can’t do!
minus-squareUschteinheim@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·18 hours agomore cultists lies
minus-squaremadthumbs@lemmy.worldOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down6·2 months agoBecause Linux uses a different security model, that doesn’t make it immune to threats.
minus-squarefreewheel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoWhere, precisely, did I say it was? No system is secure. Some attempt to promote security by design and practice, and some make it all too easy to give up security in the name of entertainment.
Windows is also really good at running kernel-based rootkits disguised as anti cheat. That’s something else Linux can’t do!
more cultists lies
Because Linux uses a different security model, that doesn’t make it immune to threats.
Where, precisely, did I say it was? No system is secure. Some attempt to promote security by design and practice, and some make it all too easy to give up security in the name of entertainment.