• Ziglin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I doubt it would actually be a stethoscope then though. Maybe something to gather the sap or to see below the bark but a stethoscope wouldn’t help with that. (I’m not a biologist but I know that stethoscopes are used to make it easier to listen to things and likely require a proper contact which one wouldn’t get on bark.)

      • lauha@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        You could search for insects under the bark using the stethoscope, like woodpeckers do.

        • Ziglin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Wouldn’t the stethoscope have trouble actually bringing the sound to the ear pieces if the bark is as rough as in the image?