• derbolle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    my opinion: it’s not stealing in the Classic sense because if you copy something you don’t take it away from its owner. it might be against the law because intellectual property is a concept.

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      What’s the aversion to calling it stealing. It feels like stealing any other thing. You would steal games for the same reasons you might steal a physical good.

      Do we just want a separate word that means digital theft?

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Because it’s not—by definition—stealing?

        Theft is the taking of another person’s personal property with the intent of depriving that person of the use of their property. Also referred to as larceny.

        Source

        Digital piracy is:

        • Copying, not taking.
        • Not affecting personal property.
        • Not depriving the creator of their property.
    • Alk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Right, I agree with that, but “because if you copy something, you don’t take it away from its owner” is a valid reason, and completely unrelated to the fact that buying isn’t owning. Even if buying WAS owning in all situations, your comment would still be true. That’s my point, the analogy in the meme is useless, and arguments like yours should be the main talking point.