Was just talking at dinner with family, and it seems a logical action to ban circumcision, as in most cases, doesn’t have consent, and is a major (genitals are important) body modification. Can we ban it at the state level? Just a thought.

  • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
    1·
    9 months ago

    Fair point, not sure somebody is doing it and if so why, but that would be indeed contra productive. If someone does not feel traumatized why would anyone would want to convince them otherwise?

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      01·
      9 months ago

      Fair point, not sure somebody is doing it and if so why, but that would be indeed contra productive

      The post I was replying to:

      For some reason, they refuse to admit they were mutilated without their consent.

      • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
        1·
        9 months ago

        For some reason, they refuse to admit they were mutilated without their consent.

        I’m not sure that is exactly how they meant it, but I can see you interpret it that way. An unnecessary, irreversible medical operation was performed on you without your consent, but since you are not bothered by it - good for you.