History did not start on 7 October. But as the world stops to mourn it will for ever be a reminder of whose lives matter.

    • maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      OK now you’re just straight up trolling. Good luck with that. I don’t think anyone around here is naive enough to not see through your rage baiting.

      • PiousAgnostic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Genocide seems like a strange word to keep throwing around. According to Palestinian health officials 42,000 people died. And Palestinian’s population is like 5 million.

        42000 dead is awful. But it’s less than 1% of 1% of the population. If Isreal is trying to eliminate all of them, it’ll take 1000’s of years at this rate.

        • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          You are ignoring a significant amount to rationalize this as not an act of genocide

          It’s well-known what the Defense Minister Yoav Gallant said on 9th of October declaring a complete siege on Gaza, cutting off water, food, fuel, stating that “We’re fighting human animals,” and we will react “accordingly.” He also said that “We will eliminate everything.” We know that Israeli army spokesperson Daniel Hagari, for example, acknowledged wanton destruction and said explicitly, “The emphasis on damage and not on accuracy.” So we’re seeing the special intent on full display. And really, I have to say, if this is not special intent to commit genocide, I really don’t know what is.

          So, when we look at the actions taken, the dropping of thousands and thousands of bombs in a couple of days, including phosphorus bombs, as we heard, on one of the most densely populated areas around the world, together with these proclamations of intent, this indeed constitutes genocidal killing, which is the first act, according to the convention, of genocide. And Israel, I must say, is also perpetrating act number two and three — that is, causing serious bodily or mental harm, and creating condition designed to bring about the destruction of the group by cutting off water, food, supply of energy, bombing hospitals, ordering the fast evictions of hospitals, which the World Health Organization has declared to be, quote, “a death sentence.” So, we’re seeing the combination of genocidal acts with special intent. This is indeed a textbook case of genocide.

          • third source under Genocide

          Euro-Med Monitor’s death count differs from that reported by the Gaza Ministry of Health — which currently stands at roughly 42,000 — as it accounts for reports by the human rights groups’ field team. But the true death toll is likely to be far, far higher; estimates from health experts have ranged from 100,000 to over 330,000, or about 15 percent of Gaza’s population.

          In its over 100-page report, Euro-Med Monitor lays out some of the worst atrocities carried out by Israeli forces over the past year. It details the “systematic acts of genocide committed in Gaza, such as the targeted killing of civilians in homes, shelters, displacement camps, and humanitarian-declared zones,” and too many other examples to list.

          Read the full report here

          • PiousAgnostic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I mean you can down vote me, then throw a wall of text at me that no one is going to read. But it doesn’t change the reality.

            40 some thousand dead out of a population 5 million people. War is truly fucked up. We don’t have to change the definition of Genocide to try and make a point. It makes the argument sound fake. Like you want to force a response for fiction.

            • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              If you looked at the report, you would see exactly how it fits the international definition of genocide. The point of these definitions is to prevent genocide before it gets to the kind of scale we have seen in the past.

              • PiousAgnostic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                30 days ago

                So the definition of genocide was changed to prevent the old definition of genocide from happening.

                So it is exactly what I was arguing. You just changed the meaning of the word to make your rhetoric sound worse than reality.

                Honestly. No lie. This makes me wonder how else your group is changing the meaning of words to paint the picture you want people to see.

                Speak plain truths, they are damning enough. Lies hurt your argument.

                • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  30 days ago

                  What are you talking about, the definition is clearly listed on page 17 of the linked report. Nothing has been changed, the point of recognizing a genocide is to stop it.

                  • PiousAgnostic@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    30 days ago

                    Let me be more clear?

                    You are lying and speaking propaganda. And it makes you untrustworthy.

                    When people sell things this hard, I know they are stupid or a liar. And I’m calling you a liar.