Thinking about this because of a greentext I saw earlier complaining about OF models.

It feels like a lot of the stigma surrounding sex work in the modern day (that doesn’t just boil down to misogyny/gender norms/religion) is based on the fact that selling intimate aspects of one’s self places a set value on something that many see as sacred; something that shouldn’t have monetary value.

Not to say anything about the economic validity of a society without currency, but I think that, hypothetically, if that were to exist, sex work would be less stigmatized since this would no longer be a factor. Those engaged in sex work would be more likely to be seen as doing it because it’s something they are good at/enjoy, and less because it’s an “easy” way to make money, as some think. It would also eliminate the fear of placing set value on social, non sex-work related intimacy (not that those fears were well-founded to begin with).

  • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    not all people deflate (traditional) intimate relationships into communistic sex work.

    difference is you can operate a sex-for-everyone-booth or have sex with someone you deeply trust, know and care about (gf).

    (i also hope that you don’t assume the readers are all heterosexual men, because then you would have much bigger problems with your gender politics)

    • cum@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t think unpaid public sex slaves exist, they always pick their mates.