• witx@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    You cherry picked his argument and left out the rest where he states China’s as cheaper standards of environmental “friendliness”

    • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Because (1) lithium contamination is a much, much, smaller problem than climate change and (2) we shouldn’t let perfect be the enemy of good. Of course, if the EU is combining taxes on EV import with an equivalent investment in public transport or cycling / walking infrastructure, I wouldn’t be complaining.