psychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 hours agoDevs gaining little (if anything) from AI coding assistantswww.cio.comexternal-linkmessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1112arrow-down110cross-posted to: planetdyne@fed.dyne.orgfuck_ai@lemmy.world
arrow-up1102arrow-down1external-linkDevs gaining little (if anything) from AI coding assistantswww.cio.compsychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 hours agomessage-square23fedilinkcross-posted to: planetdyne@fed.dyne.orgfuck_ai@lemmy.world
minus-squareTony Bark@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·6 hours agoPlaces GPT-based “AI” next to flying cars
minus-squarePennomi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 hours agoFlying cars exist, they’re just not cost effective. AFAICT there’s no GPT that is proficient at coding yet.
minus-squareotp@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 hours agoIt’s a lot easier to access ChatGPT than it is to access a flying car
minus-squaresepi@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-23 hours agoThe more people using chatgpt to generate low quality code they don’t understand, the more job safety and greater salary I get.
Places GPT-based “AI” next to flying cars
Flying cars exist, they’re just not cost effective. AFAICT there’s no GPT that is proficient at coding yet.
It’s a lot easier to access ChatGPT than it is to access a flying car
The more people using chatgpt to generate low quality code they don’t understand, the more job safety and greater salary I get.