• YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    157
    ·
    2 months ago

    I never understood the need to display multiple US flags in your yard. We get it, you live in america. You love America. We get that too. Are you afraid someone will think you no longer wish to be American if you took your flags down?

    • Vanth@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      It took me (an American) going to Ireland and Northern Ireland to realize how odd the excessive flag waving is. Still odd, but those two have the US beat.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 months ago

        But the Republic and Northern island need to fly those flags so you know where you are and whether it’s been taken over.

        Okay, maybe not, but when I was in America for a few years we decided the ridiculous fixation was so people knew that they hadn’t been taken over … again.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Just wait until you start seeing the new combination flags where it’s divided diagnoally and displays two flags communicating opposing and incompatible values. So far I’ve seen American/Israeli, American/Trump and American/Confederate Battle flags. The irony clearly goes so far over their heads, not to mention how these flags technically violate the official rules for flag display

          I do think it’s telling that I haven’t seen any American/LGBTQ flags for who the designers of these flags cater to

      • bjornsno@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        Currently live in the Republic of Ireland and I have no idea what you’re talking about? Were you here on Saint Patrick’s Day? There’s a significant amount of Palestinian flags in windows here for pretty obvious reasons but other than that I don’t think I’ve seen a flag since, again, Paddy’s day.

    • beansbeansbeans@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think for some it’s a mix of patriotism and having poor taste in decor. I know people who also have American flag swim shorts, sunglasses, etc. Also, it’s not exclusive to America. My British side of the family (especially the ones who’ve met the former Queen) have a weird amount of UK flag decor too, ranging from clock faces, throw pillows, and even an armchair covered in a giant union jack.

      • tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        As long as it’s the UK flag, and not the English flag, I’ll give them a pass. Stay clear from anyone in an England flag, drunk or sober, football or naught.

    • greenskye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Honestly I assume most people with an American flag in their yard are racist trump fans these days

    • MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      You know what’s a funny one? Flag pins. Every politician in America, take a look, they will ALL be wearing a little American Flag pin, always.

      I have to assume other politicians in other countries don’t always wear a pin of their country.

    • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Funnily enough this is exactly how people think including our house.

      I took mine down when Roe v Wade was overturned and the Progress Pride flag went up. I had been considering putting the American Flag back up recently if Democrats start winning again.

      People from every country like to pretend that patriotism isn’t a natural part of living but will stick their heads so far up their own asses when talking up all their food, culture, teams, or any other number of arbitrary things.

      And while there has been some divergence in Patriotism vs Nationalism, they’re essentially the same damn thing but with better connotations for one now lol.

      https://www.dictionary.com/e/patriotism-vs-nationalism/

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        And while there has been some divergence in Patriotism vs Nationalism, they’re essentially the same damn thing but with better connotations for one now lol.

        ok to be clear, nationalism is generally a hinge point in a fascism/authoritarian political party. Patriotism is just being proud of the country you’re a part of. A lot of people are very patriotic about their states, or sports teams. Brits especially.

    • jpeps@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The flag patriotism and intense praise of military action was a lot for me. I remember going to a mall, and seeing what would typically be reserved as disabled parking was instead veteran parking?? And then the cinema in the mall loudly advertising its discount for veterans as well. We do have a general discount in my country too, but it’s not so… intense. Like no one else has to know it’s happening because it’s more of a state benefit than it is a form of patriotism.

      Neighbourhoods in general are what I found the strangest when I stayed in the States. Flags everywhere as you say, but also just the intense size, and the lack of walkability (the kurb drops felt massive compared to my country). Beyond that I remember walking for around 20 minutes through a suburb and counting upwards of 10 different company logos on rubbish bins. This neighbourhood seemingly had 10 different bin days rather than one centralised service.

    • paddirn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I grew up in a home where we just never thought about wearing, or not wearing, shoes in the house. Like, we obviously didn’t track mud all over the place if our shoes were that dirty, but if we were wearing our shoes inside, nobody said anything or cared, it was just whatever. Married a Kenyan who put her foot down and was like, “Are you crazy?” It’s apparently a big thing elsewhere in the world. In Kenya alot of roads aren’t paved, things get dusty, and it’s just common sense that you don’t walk all over the house with dirty shoes, so I get it from that perspective.

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yeah that’s a huge part of it. Few Americans (me included) frequently walk outdoors on anything but sidewalks or paved roads in their normal day to day travels. When I go hiking I take those shoes off before I get back into the car, but my daily driver boat shoes which rarely touch actual dirt? I don’t have a problem leaving those on in most places, my house included. Same I imagine for Americans where their job is construction or something where your shoes are dirtied, take the work shoes off when you get home, but it’s fine to wear more casual shoes

        Edit: what a strange thing to get downvoted about

        Double edit: I guess the first downvotes were just from people who very much don’t like shoes in the house under any circumstances. That’s ok. If I come to your house my shoes will come off. If you come to mine, feel free to leave them on if they aren’t muddy.

    • danjoubu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      As an American, it drives me crazy. Then there’s those heathens who lay on the bed with shoes on!

      • weeeeum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 months ago

        American of asian descent, absolutely ludicrous! It would perhaps be more forgiviable if all of the floors were furnished in hardwood and tile, but they’ll wear shoes even on carpet! Immediately after entering one of these heathen’s houses, I long for the soft, lucious, kempt, carpets of my own abode, compared to the repuslive, stiff, flat and even crunchy carpets of my white friends. Frankly it offends me, deeply. I must slap my friends silly before entering my home to remove their filthy clogs.

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          That was a joy to read.

          I’m sorry to tell you I am one of those people, as is my family. Every so often I have a moment of clarity about it, but it doesn’t last long.

      • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I wear my street shoes inside except winter. Both my work boots come off regardless. Also have house slippers. But I’ll be damned if me or someone put their shoes on a bed, or even a couch for that matter.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          Both my work boots come off regardless.

          No one asked, but now I need to know: when would you only take ONE work boot off?

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Only place I’ve live where this is taboo is Chicagoland. And that’s to be expected with the muddy snow.

      Here in the South we usually don’t have carpets, no reason to take our shoes off.

      • zcd@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        56
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Thinking that there is no reason to take your shoes off is the most American thing in the world. There is poop, pee, puke, pollen, pollution, parvo and prions out there, among other things.

        In Japan the entryway of a house is usually a step lower than the rest of the house. It is considered part of the outside, where the shoes stay, as well as all of the dirty things from the outside that are on the shoes. And symbolically, your troubles from the outside world are not brought into the house either. It’s a major faux pas to wear your shoes in the house past this step and bring all that shit inside. Interesting contrast

        • 8000gnat@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          yep, living in San Francisco made me a shoes off indoors guy, for every p you listed*

          *except for prions. mmmm, delicious prions

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Thinking that there is no reason to take your shoes off is the most American thing in the world. There is poop, pee, puke, pollen, pollution, parvo and prions out there, among other things.

          you’re already breathing it, unless you’re literally licking the floor it’s probably not a huge concern.

          Are you japanese? I know they generally have pretty strict social rules.

      • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s not carpets that I take my shoes off for - it’s so I don’t track public bathroom and outside street debris into my house.

      • makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ever walked into a public toilet? Well, that piss is now all over your floor at home.

        As is spit from the street. Remnant dog poo, bird poo, etc etc.

        Take your shoes off. Please.

      • RBWells@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah. No carpets, dogs coming in and out. I only take mine off if they are legit muddy, it’s a lost cause, I am not going to make everyone take off their shoes. We aren’t eating off the floor. I am also willing to sit on the ground outside, turn cartwheels, etc. Really just not that paranoid about dirt.

        Up north I understand everyone has carpets.

        Some places there is much more sitting on the floor.

        It seems situational to me.

        Nobody is putting their shoes on the furniture though, they are putting them on the floor.

    • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Do I just live in a weird bubble? I live in the US and I am rarely at someone’s house who doesn’t remove their shoes nowadays. I certainly grew up wearing shoes at home, but that’s changed significantly over the past 20 years or so.

      • SSTF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Anecdotally this is also my experience. I grew up with shoes off in the house, but even up to the early 00’s it seemed to be a cultural outlier in the US.

        These days I think the majority of people who I go over to visit have a shoes off rule. Seems like the split is between the older half of millennials and up shoes on, and younger half and down shoes off for the most part.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        From my experience this varies wildly regionally. My family in LA will put on shoes as part of getting dressed in the morning, but in Wisconsin you take your shoes off at the door since theres a good chance they’re wet or even muddy depending on the season

      • 200ok@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Sooooo comfortable!

        As soon as I get home, all of my outside items are exchanged for comfy inside items. It’s like a physical form of masking.

        • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, I just got home and switched to loose running shorts (it’s hot here at the moment). Why would I wanna stay wearing jeans when I can relax?

  • weew@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    American flags everywhere. Like EVERYWHERE. I get a bit of national pride but holy crap, every other house in the street is flying a flag, clothing has flag patterns, bumper sticker American flag, it’s everywhere. And no, it wasn’t even close to July 4.

    It’s like Americans are afraid they might forget what country they’re in if they aren’t in sight of a flag at all times.

  • Nath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ll try to avoid stuff you know is weird.

    1. Adjectives. You can’t just have a thing. It has to have an adjective. For example: Milk. I wanted to buy milk. I get to the milk section, and there’s no such thing. There’s x milk and y milk and about a dozen other variants. Where is the basic milk (it turns out, I wanted “4% milk”) in this damned place?
    2. Fresh produce. In fairness you’ve gotten loads better on this one after subsequent visits, but beyond some basic staples like potatoes, carrots, corn etc it was really limiting what fruit and vegetables you could get in the supermarket. Also: baby carrots are weird.
    3. Your cheese is radioactive yellow. Cheese is not supposed to be that colour - but you seem expect it to be for some reason, so your producers add yellow colouring to their cheese.
    4. Your eggs are weird. I’m not sure what yous guys do to to them, but it’s like you blast away half the shell and are left with a porous super-white textured inner shell. They need to be refrigerated and last a fraction of the time they’d last if you just left them alone and sold them as they are laid.
    5. Your bread tastes weird. Maybe it’s sugar or preservatives in it, I don’t know. Bread is meant to have a really short ingredients list like flour, water, salt yeast and maybe a touch of oil and sugar. Take a look at the ingredients on your bread and it’s 5 lines long.
    6. Portions! Your food portions are ludicrous. I’d much rather pay half the price for half as much food as they offer on the menu.
    7. Money. You have this weird unconscious pecking order thing in your culture where you value people more based on their bank balance. You show a weird unconscious level of respect to someone who is rich. And similarly, unconsciously look down on someone poorer than you. Not in a mean way - just as a “I’m better than this person” way that is hard to quantify. You are aware at some level roughly how rich everyone you deal with is. I see this trait far less in people under 20. I hope there’s a cultural shift on this one, because money on its own is a weird way to measure someone’s worth.
    8. Your police are run by the local counties. I think your schools also? I know you have state and federal police also, but most places only have police and schools at those levels.
    9. I’ll mostly stay clear of health, because you know your health system is weird. But I will say that it’s weird that very few of your hospitals are run by government. They’re mostly run for profit. Health is meant to be a government service.
    10. Outside a few cities, you barely have public transport of any sort. LA is a mega metropolis, and it’s train network is a joke for that level of population - something like 100 stations for 18 million people?
    11. You have no idea what’s going on. Most of you couldn’t name the UK Prime Minister (this one has been hard to keep track of, in fairness), the German Chancellor or any of the G20 leaders aside from USA and maybe Canada/China. You don’t know about geopolitics beyond whatever you guys are doing. Your world news is literally stuff USA is involved in.
    12. I’ll finish on a weird one: you guys are lovely. This may because I’m white and have an exotic accent to you guys, but almost everyone I’ve ever encountered from the USA in or out of the country has been wonderful. You don’t seem to think of your fellow countrymen you meet as ‘good’ by default. There’s a lot less connection and respect to each other than other nations I’ve been to.
  • Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Family eating at shooters (and the whole hooters/twin peaks concept)

    Need to take the car for a 500m trip because there is no sidewalk and a highway to cross

    • fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      86
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The car thing really blew my mind. My hotel was 400m from the office but 1.6km by car. Colleagues were waiting for a taxi while I walked. I had to cut over a couple of car parks and a bit of grass (zero sidewalks) and was there in a few minutes while they turned up 15min later since they were waiting for a taxi.

      The worst part, they all jumped in cars to go 300m down the road for lunch. Yeah, I walked. With looking for a parking space then walking from the space to the restaurant, they got there after me.

      I adore Americans; they’ve been nothing except kind and generous to me in every part of the country I’ve visited but damn, the money they’re wasting alone just starting their engines and the wear and tear on the vehicles blows my fucking mind. Build some sidewalks, guys!

      • greenskye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 months ago

        Many of us would like this, but it’s dangerous or even illegal to get to some places by walking in large parts of America. And zoning laws make it really difficult to change.

      • Wahots@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Depends on the state, but biking can be legitimately faster in cities with gridlock traffic. Particularly if there are biking greenways. I unintentionally beat friends back from a beach after they hailed a taxi, and I ebiked the ~3km home. In their defense, the terrain is extremely hilly, and some of them aren’t super comfortable on the city ebikes.

        • boatswain@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m in the US, and I bike about 6 miles in to the office; with rush hour traffic, it’d probably take me about that long to drive in. Plus, I get some much needed exercise.

      • Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        How so ?

        Ilegal to walk to to Costco sounds so much non sense to me ? like you can’t go shopping without a car ? Legally speaking ? That makes no sense

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          If the store is technically on a highway that can mean it is both unsafe and illegal to walk/bike there (depending on local laws of course)

          The fact that stores and schools and other critical public spaces can be located on highways is certainly something that should be talked about more

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      and the whole hooters/twin peaks concept

      I haven’t thought about Hooters in years. It always did seem like a dated concept from the 1980s that was somehow still clinging to life in the 90s. It’s still in business, so obviously somebody must be going to them, but I don’t know if I’d call it normal for most Americans.

  • Chris@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Being overly fake nice because you want a tip. Tbh I’d be more inclined to tip you if you left me alone and stopped talking to me.

    The whole tipping thing in USA is weird. Everyone wants a tip, it’s entirely random (as a non-American) how much tip to give. Just pay your staff a wage they can actually live on ffs.

    • TheKracken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 months ago

      As an American I agree it’s fucking weird. Tips should be for exceptional service and not an obligation.

    • Semperverus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s actually a loose set of rules to it. Im not sure where the specific numbers came from, but 22% of the bill as a tip is considered “excellent service”, 18% or so is considered “mid” or “acceptable” service, and anything below that is a sliding scale of how bad you think they did. 0% is either you being rude and/or saying “i dont believe in tips”, but giving a $0.01 tip is basically saying “fuck you, you piece of shit,” (because fishing out a penny or writing it in takes more effort than opting out).

      • cornshark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        2 months ago

        Those numbers used to be 12, 15 and 18. They’ve increased, but I’m not sure why, since they’re percentages. They keep up with increased food prices automatically. Not sure why tip growth has outpaced food prices.

        • Semperverus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It may also be my region. Its always been this way for me for at least the last 15 years or so.

          Now, those squarepay terminals that suggest 30% tips or similar can eat rocks.

      • Snowcano@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yeah but how do you consult those rules? How often are they updated? How do you get notified of updates?

        The fact that there are no answers to these questions and therefore everyone is working with mismatching rule sets makes the whole thing useless. You can be totally well meaning and still piss off a server because somehow you don’t know what the currently acceptable magic number is.

        I recently visited the states for the first time in a decade and didn’t find out until afterwards that 15% is now considered by some people to be “low”. Sorry everyone who I tipped, I shafted you without realizing it. 🤷‍♂️

        • Poik@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          We don’t even get this memo. I thought it was still 15, 18, and 20. And I’m wholey against mandatory tipping, but always do so because I don’t want the underpaid staff to starve. I have enough friends in food service who can barely pay their rent with multiple roommates.

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Parts of Greece apparently also do tips. Is that new? Seems like it’s leeching into Europe :/

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It’s not the healthcare that bothered me most, although it did.

    It’s the cognitive dissonance around the unavailability of healthcare in order to avoid anxiety over the fact that a traffic accident can bankrupt you with no relief. Ignoring the risk takes some serious mental gymnastics and basic math failure to get there, but when brought up in this environment - where a TV show about a teacher who has to cook and sell meth to get hospital money is actually a plausible plot where no one actually examines the mercenary care at all and the main character just pays it - it’s just a part of their existence.

    Not understanding that few other people live like this - cubans don’t live like this - is absurd.

  • mbirth@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The fear of naked (intact) female bodies, i.e. censoring of even the slightest nudity, when at the same time, it’s totally fine to have minors play computer games where they can dissect other humans in great bloody detail.

    Oh, and chocolate that tastes like somebody barfed into it during manufacturing.

  • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m from Alberta Canada. I’ve worked up North in camp jobs, and have been working in the trades with the rowdiest people our country has to offer.

    Every time I’ve been to the states I’m shocked at how aggressive a large portion of your population is willing to talk to people. Every time I’ve gone there I’ve had at least one negative aggressive interaction with one of your citizens. I’m a large man with a beard and tattooes up to my neck, I’m a pretty intimidating looking dude paired with the Canadian politeness we’re known for. I do not understand how this keeps happening. And I see you guys do it to eachother too! It’s fucking wild.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Go fuck yourself. /s

      Just kidding, but yeah, we suck as a people. But I’ll be friendly to ya when you land in my neighborhood.

      • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 months ago

        It should be pointed out that MOST Americans I met were not like that. But it’s a large enough amount that it’s always been a noticeable difference from home.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          As an American I think it’s largely that we generally suck at dealing with negative emotions. For many that means bottling it up and being kind anyways, but we have the assholes and you learn to walk away, or clap back, or whatever works for you and they just get angrier at being dismissed. They aren’t mad at you, they just suck and we’re bad at helping people not suck, especially since they tend to love guns

          • AFallingAnvil@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Fuck clapping back in a country with that high a level of access to guns and that little mental health access. Anyone could have a gun and I’m not playing that game. I’m not usually too confrontation adverse but I’d change my name to Mat (First name Floor) before arguing with a weirdly aggressive American.

      • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I’ve been to Montana, Texas, Florida, Seattle, and Tennessee and Las Vegas most recently. Also worked at a tourist town with lots of Americans for several months in Canmore and the Americans there seemed to have a similar attitude.

      • subtext@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah it’s very surprising to me as well. As a life-long resident of one of the states mentioned, having lived in both major cities as well and small-medium towns, I don’t think I’ve experienced this “aggression”

        • macrocarpa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sometimes the base level of aggression or the base level of inflection is way higher than what you’re locally tuned for.

          Anecdotally I have found even business conversations with people from the US to be over the top. Especially through the sales cycle. There is a lot of hype that I need to adjust for in comparison to vendors in the UK, Europe and Asia.

          It’s not a bad thing, it’s a social standard. I probably appear quiet reserved and shy by comparison.

      • goldenbug@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I give you my silly example. We were on a work trip with a college. We were talking in English. I said something like: I wanna try a hash brown! Never had one.

        This dude replies to a conversation he wasn’t part of: THEY ARE JUST POTATO! very angrily.

        Yeah… I know… Turns out I love potato

    • scottywh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s a lot of regional variation in what people do or don’t find to be “aggressive”.

    • corroded@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      In some states, these signs don’t even mean that a person can’t carry a concealed weapon into the shopping center. In my state, for instance, assuming you are otherwise able to legally carry a gun (meaning you took a class and aren’t a felon), the list of areas where you can’t legally carry a gun is very limited: Federal buildings, courthouses, etc. If a business has a sign posted stating “no guns allowed,” you can still legally carry your weapon in that business. If an employee sees that you’re armed, they can ask you to leave, and you’re trespassing if you refuse, but nothing legally stops you from carrying a gun into the establishment in the first place.

      As a disclaimer, I’m not arguing this one way or another. I have a license to carry a concealed handgun, in fact. Just sharing information.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah I’m sure minimum wage clerks are going to totally feel comfortable asking the armed person (someone who believes they need to arm themselves to enter a shopping center) to please leave.

        • corroded@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Most people who have a concealed carry permit are generally law-abiding. I would certainly leave immediately if asked.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yeah I’m sure minimum wage clerks are going to totally feel comfortable asking the armed person (someone who believes they need to arm themselves to enter a shopping center) to please leave.

          yeah, they probably would. Shooting someone is very fucking illegal.

          also most larger establishments are going to have security, and, you can call the police if you wish.

      • SSTF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        If a business has a sign posted stating “no guns allowed,” you can still legally carry your weapon in that business.

        I’m sure that’s the practicality, but I am skeptical of the legality of a CCW permit trumping the rights of the property owner.

        It sounds more like breaking the law and just not getting caught. Do you have any links to CCW permit overriding property owner rights?

        • logging_strict@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Property owner rights do not magically override the 1A.

          Property owners are welcome to write scary notices. They are just not legally enforceable.

        • corroded@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t know the statutes offhand; I’m basing this on what I was taught in my CCW class years ago.

          The general idea is that the state sets limited laws on where you can’t carry concealed. Government buildings, etc. These restrictions hold the force of law. For a private property owner, they can certainly say “no guns,” but it has the same legal weight as if they said “no hats.” They can set rules for their property, but those rules don’t magically become law. That’s where trespassing laws come in; if you’re asked to leave, they have the right to ask you to do so.

          Some states do have laws in place stating that “no guns” signs are legally binding, but the signs must meet certain legal criteria as far as wording. Surprisingly, I think Texas is one of these states, but I could be wrong.

          My state is solidly blue, so it does seem strange to me that the laws are written as they are.

      • bjornsno@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The sign actually would give me an increased sense of security yeah.

        Obviously a lunatic out to do a mass shooting would disregard the sign but your average gun wielder might be offended and take their business elsewhere – and statistically that’s the one who’s more likely to shoot me. That’s my logic as a Norwegian who’s lived there for just a year anyway.

        • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Statistically speaking, people that have conceal carry licenses are less likely to engage in criminal activity than the average person, and less likely to shoot a person in general. The people to worry about are the people that carry firearms without having a valid carry license. (This doesn’t apply in the relatively few states that don’t require permits to carry concealed firearms.) Essentially, people that obey one law–getting a permit before they carry a firearm–tend to be likely to obey most laws.

          • bjornsno@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Fair enough, though a person with a gun is much more likely to shoot me than a person without a gun. Any measure to reduce the amount of people in my vicinity carrying guns has my full support. If 1/1000 (number pulled out of my ass obviously) gun owners end up shooing someone, and you reduce the amount of people around me carrying guns from 1000 to 10, you’ve just dramatically increased my statistical probability of living a full life.

            I actually looked and couldn’t find the murder rate in the population of gun owners with basic googling but the actual number doesn’t matter when it’s being compared to 0.

            • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              According to a quick Google search, 3 in 10 American adults say that they currently own a firearm; that’s around 82,000,000 gun owners in the US. Last time I checked, there were around 45,000 annual gun deaths in the US, of which just under 2/3 were suicide. That leaves somewhere around 18,000 deaths that are homicides of some form (which also includes legal self-defense). So it’s far, far less than 1/1000 gun owners that are going to shoot someone (other than intentionally shooting themselves, and IMO that’s a different issue entirely).

              But, sure, if in your opinion that only correct number of gun deaths is 0, then yes, removing guns and collectively forgetting how to make them is the only solution. Just like if your opinion is that the only correct number of traffic deaths is zero, then the only reasonable solution is the completely elimination of all means of transportation other than feet.

              • bjornsno@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                You’ve done your division twice there, it seems. The ~45000 is the number after you take away the suicides.. So pretty much 1/2000, so I guess I was pretty close.

                Of course the only correct number of gun deaths among civilians is 0, do you disagree with that? As for your comparison to vehicular deaths, let’s remember the context here. The question is whether or not I feel safer in a place that doesn’t allow guns or one that does. So you should really be asking if I think it’s better to walk on the sidewalk or in the road shared with cars. Of course I might still get hit by a car on the sidewalk, but where would you feel safer?

                • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Of course the only correct number of gun deaths among civilians is 0, do you disagree with that?

                  I absolutely do disagree, yes. If my life or safety is being threatened by someone, then I absolutely have the right to use any level of force necessary to defend myself, up to and including lethal force.

                  BTW, the way that you state that question is a form of manipulation. It’s a common tactic used in high-pressure sales.

            • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Fair enough, though a person with a gun is much more likely to shoot me than a person without a gun.

              they’re more likely to have the probability of shooting you in an extremely bad encounter. If you have an encounter that bad with someone, you’re going to get fucked up one way or another, and it’s probably you who caused the problem, since you’d be the common denominator here. Otherwise it’s basically just up to random statistics or not as to whether you get gun violenced.

              Statistically, speaking, a person with a gun is more capable of shooting you than someone without a gun. I would be willing to be the number of gun owners that have shot a person is probably less than 0.01%

              and you reduce the amount of people around me carrying guns from 1000 to 10, you’ve just dramatically increased my statistical probability of living a full life.

              also this isn’t accurate since it would mostly matter on who shoots you, rather than a gun owner shooting you. Most of the gun violence in the US is done via illegal or unregistered guns. I.E. not legal license carrying gun owners.

              I know the rough per capita numbers per 100,000 people iirc, is about 5-30 varying per state obviously. But states like NYC and cali have some of the lowest, with random buttfuck nowhere land no gun law states having upwards of 30. To be clear, this is a 0.0003% chance at the highest level. Most of which is probably going to be avoided by simply engaging in basic self preservation behaviors. Since most gun violence isn’t just random acts of violence.

              • bjornsno@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                Look are you really trying to argue that the amount of people with guns in my vicinity is irrelevant to my chances of getting shot?

                • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  between legal gun owners, and the statistical chunk of gun violence, yes it does matter.

                  If you’re in a place where legal gun owners are, and where illegal gun owners are unlikely to be (or at least unlikely to cause problems in) statistically yes, you would expect that to make a difference.

                  Just to be clear, walking into a room that has a gun in it doesn’t magically make you more likely to get shot. Walking into a room with a person whose armed doesn’t make them more likely to shoot you or for you to get shot, it increases the possibility that you could be shot by virtue of there being a gun now, but that’s irrelevant to actually getting shot yes.

                  You realize we have knives in kitchens right? Does walking into a kitchen automatically increase the chances of you getting stabbed?

                  it’s hard to explain this, because you’re essentially operating a rokos basilisk premise here. The very concept of a gun doesn’t increase the chances of you getting shot, the gun being nearer to you than it previously was doesn’t increase that chance. The gun being next to you or on you doesn’t change this. The hands of the person it’s in may change it, but that’s still a third party variable so we can’t really account for that one here. Even if the gun is pointed at you, it doesn’t arguably increase the chances that you can get shot, it might be unloaded for all you know. If someone who is aggressing you, or who you are aggressing on is pointing a gun at you, yes that would probably drastically increase the chances of you getting shot.

                  If you are aggressing someone who owns a gun, or they are aggressing you, it may increase the chances of them pulling the gun on you. But that doesn’t necessarily increase the chance of you getting shot.

                  to be clear here, the only real situation in which you are more likely to be shot, is in which someone is pointing a gun at you, and telling you that they are going to shoot you. Every other situation is going to be several orders of magnitude less significant, and effectively irrelevant here.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          and statistically that’s the one who’s more likely to shoot me. That’s my logic as a Norwegian who’s lived there for just a year anyway.

          what for though? are you just harassing people in public? I don’t understand why someone would be concerned about someone just having a gun. You probably won’t even see this person, let alone bump into them, let alone get into an altercation with them.

          And most of them are sane and reasonable people who understand how de-escalation works.

          • bjornsno@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            The question was whether or not a sign saying guns not allowed at a mall would make me feel more safe there. I would see them, I might bump into them, it’s a mall. The argument that most of them are sane and reasonable doesn’t reassure me much when we’re talking about people with a magic kill button.

            • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              i guess my point that you aren’t picking up on here is that this is quite literally an irrational fear. You should be more worried about being hit by a car, or punched in the face. Or falling down a set of stairs or something.

              • bjornsno@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                I’ve been punched before, complete blind violence. The difference is that being punched didn’t kill me. The fear of getting shot in America is not irrational. Again refer to the page full of statistics in my previous comment.

                • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  being shot doesn’t have to kill you either. A lot of people survive being shot, lots of people also die from getting punched.

                  What if they had a knife? Those aren’t exactly hard to get, knives arguably cause more violent injuries than guns do. Unless you’re shooting someone point blank with a 45 or something.

      • BreadOven@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Hmmm. Not overly, I assume it’s just a “suggestion” but am not sure. But I have had to travel there quite a bit for work, and I usually feel mostly secure. But I am aware a lot of people carry them in the US, and mostly just keep to myself moreso than I normally would outside of work things.

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    based on knowledge of the US : many things that other places take for granted or fight to preserve, you guys struggle to obtain.

    based on my trip : fucking nothing, I visited new york and stayed at a run down, pre paid hotel. I ate food from stores or carry out. I can’t exactly critique the healthcare system, tipping culture, driving culture when I had access to a fairly modern public transport system, didn’t need medical assistance and didn’t need to tip 50 people just to eat one thing.

    EDIT: it’s like asking tourists in antalya at the beach what they think of turkey, they’re fucking tourists, they aren’t affected by the dictator and his bullshit

    • assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I was just in Göcek and Ankara and I had some wildly interesting interactions with locals when they asked me how I liked Turkey.

      “I like it, very beautiful country, lovely people, great food.”

      “So you’d move here?”

      “Uh… perhaps not”

      “So you don’t like Turkey”

      👀

      lol

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        those fuckers have some nerve asking you that shit, when we have so much brain drain that most high streets are basically completely catering to elderly people with hearing aid and similar stores on each one, because all the working age people leave to live abroad.

        No shit rich foreigners don’t want to move to turkey.

        source : part of the brain drain for both turkey and the UK. fuck them countries.

        • assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          My girlfriend and her sister are also in the brain drain. Definitely a sad state of affairs, so many of her friends and friends family’s have been either political prisoners, or had ongoing court cases, etc.

          I’ve been trying to learn Turkish so we can move her family over here too and I can actually chat with them, but I fear they’ll need to work on their English so they can get around.

          • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            many of her friends and friends family’s have been either political prisoners, or had ongoing court cases, etc.

            wow. I’m assuming the people asking you “wanna move to Turkey?” aren’t aware of this.

            Best of luck to your gf’s family , gurbet recognise gurbet.

  • nutomic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I only stopped there for transit on a flight to Mexico. Just before boarding my flight I was told that I need a visa for the US, which is extremely weird because normally airports have transit zones where you don’t need any visa. But apparently the US is special, so you actually have to enter the country before going right back into the airport. This nonsense made me miss my flight.

    Also I remember in the airport there was a security guard doing nothing but shouting nonstop that it’s not allowed to carry water. Why not simply put up a sign?

      • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        2 months ago

        We read, just not posted signs without a skull on it or something cool like that.

        If it is important they would put it on a hat.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I’d also say sign fatigue (plus general fatigue) is a thing. When you go to an airport security line there’s like these giant signboards stood up like the 200 Commandments, each with a mix of pictures and walls of text of for things you’re not allowed to bring on a plane. Or some things you can check and not carry on or you can carry on and not check. And you’re also expected to know all of that while you are in transit, stressed, and maybe also sleep deprived.

          Too many signs to properly pay attention to them all.

      • tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        i dont obey bullshit signs. like there are still signs demanding i wear mask in a restaurant, but nobody cares.

        its a diff story if someone gives me a hard time: `sure if it|l make you shut up´

    • Badabinski@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 months ago

      W.r.t. water bottles, I think it’s because people don’t look at or think about the signs that are often posted. A loud person yelling specifically at you is much more likely to make someone stop and ask themselves if they have a water bottle.

      I’m definitely not defending it, but that’s my take on the matter. The whole water bottle thing is just security theater anyways.

      • nutomic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Or you guys like to be shouted at. There is no other country that does this.

        • stringere@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 months ago

          You’ve been here. So you’ve witnessed first hand our lack of social cohesion. We’re not a civilized people. We’re barely above feral and deeply ensconced in tribalism. Capitalists did a great job gaslighting this country into this situation where we’re aware of their abuse but somehow still manage to blame one another instead of the abuser. The Business Plot didn’t fail, it bided its time and rolled out slowly and surreptitiously.

        • Badabinski@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I definitely haven’t been shouted at in any of the European airports I’ve been in (from memory, KEF, HEL, AMS, MAD, BCN, NCE, and BER, so not super representative of the continent), so to me, it seems like an American phenomenon. I haven’t been to Canada enough to know what it’s like there. It’s also somewhat recent. I’ve been flying for 25ish years now, and I feel like the yelling has only been happening for the past, I dunno, 5-7 years?

          As others have said, I don’t think it’s that we like being shouted at. We just have a large number of people who are, uh, “ruggedly individual,” to put it in nice terms. Those people don’t really think about others enough, so you have to yell at them to get them to pay attention to the world around them. I’m the type of person that looks up the rules before I leave and makes sure I have all of my shit out of my pockets before I even enter the security line to ensure I don’t reduce the efficiency of the security checkpoint. I often feel a bit exasperated with the people who don’t think about others in those situations.

          As a means of dealing with it, I’ve found that smiling, making eye contact, and nodding at the TSA agent doing the yelling makes them less likely to yell at me while simultaneously making me feel a bit less frustrated—expressing nice feelings and trying to show some common humanity with the people I’m interacting with makes it harder for me to feel angry. Not saying that’d work for everyone, but it’s helpful for me.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      Just before boarding my flight I was told that I need a visa for the US […] This nonsense made me miss my flight.

      I WOULD HAVE FUCKING LEFT IF YOU’D LET ME ASSHOLE

      • nutomic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not like that, they didn’t let me board my flight from Europe to Texas. Even though I had a connecting flight to Mexico few hours later. Why can’t they have a visa free transit zone like every other country in the world?

        • stringere@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          So they can rob noncitizens using asset forfeiture laws. Never travel in or through the US if you need to transport large sums of money or valuables.

          Actually, the better advice is never travel in or through the US. I wish that were an option for me.

        • MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          A couple of times I’ve travelled Air NZ route that goes London-Auckland via LAX. The plane has to stop to refuel I guess. All the passengers are forced to queue up to be fingerprinted and have their eyeballs scanned, while a security guard walks up and down screaming “STAY IN THE LINE!” Then they’re herded into a lounge barely big enough to hold everyone (first class passengers have their own little pen next to the toilets). Apologetic air crew distribute apples, crisps and bottles of water. For hours. Through a glass wall is a view of the rest of the airport: shops, cafes, bars, space to stroll. But hey, at least you get to not miss your flight, and the US is safe from Kiwi tourists.

          I don’t know if they still do this, I avoid the route.

          • BlueÆther@no.lastname.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            did london via LAX as well. This was my only experience of the US:

            Arrive LAX and do the whole enter the US customs, the agent asks if anyone has had access to my baggage to which I answered “everyone here with security access”. The shit head was not impressed and let me know.

          • Badabinski@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            LAX is also just the worst fucking airport. I remember feeling shocked the first time I flew to LAX. I thought that a city like LA would have a nice, efficient airport, given how much traffic that airport gets and how much money LA has. It’s been 10 years since I was last there, but I wouldn’t be surprised if LAX was just as dingy and disorganized now.

            I’m sure the whole security theater bullshit would occur no matter what airport you flew through, and I don’t know if the experience would have been any nicer anywhere else. I just don’t like that airport, I’m in a bad mood, and I want to complain about things on the internet.

            • MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Ive travelled a lot, and I’ve never been yelled at in any other airport. In other international hub airports you follow “transit” signs to get to the main waiting area, with shops, cafes, bars etc.

        • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I only stopped there for transit on a flight to Mexico. Just before boarding my flight I was told that I need a visa for the US, which is extremely weird because normally airports have transit zones where you don’t need any visa. But apparently the US is special, so you actually have to enter the country before going right back into the airport. This nonsense made me miss my flight.

          Not like that, they didn’t let me board my flight from Europe to Texas. Even though I had a connecting flight to Mexico few hours later.

          I am no longer on your side. if your journey is :

          European country X -> Somewhere in the US -> Texas -> Mexico

          Then of course you’re going through security controls, etc etc. You’re going from the international processing and flights part of the airport to the domestic flights part of the airport, which is the zone where any asshole in that country can travel in, so you’re properly entering the US. Of course you need proper clearance and visas and all that.

          I initially assumed your journey was

          Non US country-> Somewhere in the US -> Mexico

          which you’d be completely right

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      China did that to me too, except I didn’t miss my flight. After getting off the plane they made us go through immigration and when they asked how long I was staying I said about 3 hours. Stamped my passport with a 1 day visa haha

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The US doesn’t do sanitized transport because there’s not really a need in most airports. The vast majority of passengers are Americans or coming into America. It’s also self reinforced, because once others learn they stop doing layovers in the US. It might make sense for a few large airports like Atlanta, JFK, and LAX.

  • sweetpotato@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    2 months ago

    Your urban planning. Your cities are unwalkable, the scenery makes me depressed af, everything is scaled up for cars, even restaurants are for cars, the highways are huge, all I can see is tar. I don’t know how you can live like that.