• CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I didn’t even know they did that, Glad I don’t have an account with them. I’m partially deaf, most music I can’t understand what someone singing. Those fun things people do of like “most common misheard lyrics” is basically my life. On the plus side I enjoy music from around the world because unintelligible music is unintelligible no matter where it’s from. They’re very few artists I feel like I can understand, and realistically I’m probably wrong.

    In real life, I read lips to help augment my terrible hearing. Fun fact during the mask man dates during COVID, was probably the worst time for me. A lot of people I could hear talking as I could hear noise but I could not make out what it was. Leading to a lot of awkward conversations.

    Anyhoo, that’s all to say that for music that I do like I do have to see the lyrics. It’s what converts the noise into words.

    So, fuck you Spotify, My life’s difficult enough already, I’m not paying your shitty service so you can charge me for my impairment.

    • Woht24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Everyone is going on about this as anti disability, but why does a disability entitle you to a service that’s paid?

      Unpaid Spotify sucks, full stop, no matter what part of you works or doesn’t.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        but why does a disability entitle you to a service that’s paid?

        why would you limit the ability to use lyrics though? It’s the same shit that every big article tabloid is doing “pay us five dollar a month and we will show you our articles, that we think are good” after showing you like three, in four months for free.

        Either give people access to the service, or don’t, don’t play the bullshit of “well actually, here’s a free sample”

        • Woht24@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Same reason any tech company limit the ability to do anything - bandwidth, ownership etc.

          Even if ‘lyrics’ are free, they still need to be written and proof read. You’re either going to have to pay other companies to provide you the lyrics or pay your staff to write them down.

          There’s so many levels to this, Spotify still sucks, but you have to look at it realistically .

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            yeah but that still begs the question of why even give limited access. Just put it behind the paywall, it’s not like people don’t understand what spotify is, and it gives them a better excuse for selling a service anyway.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        They’re lyrics, intentionally making the service worse for people with hearing disabilities is ableist.