He got 2000 “wrong”… Or did he?

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I actually think you had a flawed process if you were projecting a Trump win in 2016, getting that “right” doesn’t impress me. Comey re-announcing new emails was 11 days before the election, there wasn’t time to see what people thought of it.

    Edit: The downvoters don’t remember the election. Clinton was winning basically every poll, her numbers peaked after the Access Hollywood tape and dropped from that peak, she was still winning polls by 4 points on election day. There are vagueries of voting behavior based on weather in different locations and the vote was super close in the swing states. Even with perfect state by state information adjusted by poll error, it was less than 50/50 Trump would win. It was a bad prediction.

    It happened to happen, because things with 40% odds happen 40% of the time, but predicting the 40% outcome is bad process.

      • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        So he would have been wrong if the Comey announcement didn’t come out and turn people off from voting for Hillary. Bad process, right result.