• ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is like saying before you can be a writer, you need to understand latin and the history of language.

    • Narauko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      You should if you want to be a science writer or academic, which lets be honest is a better comparison here. If your job involves latin for names and descriptions then you probably should take at least a year or two of latin if you don’t want to make mistakes here and there out of ignorance.

    • daqu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Before you can be a writer, you need to sharpen your own pencil.

      • Ziglin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I like informing yourself about the note taking app you’re writing with a little more. It makes it a bit more obvious that it’s kind of obvious but can have many advantages.

        Personally though I don’t really see upside of building a computer as you could also just research things and not build it or vice versa. (Maybe it’s good for looking at bug reports?)

        A 30 minute explanation on how CPUs work that I recently got to listen in on was likely more impactful on my C/assembly programming than building my own computer was.

        • jdeath@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          you wouldn’t want somebody that hates animals to become a veterinarian just because of money-lust. the animals would suffer, the field as a whole, too. maybe they start buying up veterinary offices and squeeze the business for everything they can, resulting in worse outcomes- more animals dying and suffering, workers get shorted on benefits and pay.

          people chasing money ruin things. we want an industry full of people that want to actually build things.

          • Ziglin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I don’t really see the connection to my comment.

            In this example wouldn’t the programmer be more of a pharmacist? (The animal body the computer and its brain the user?)

            Your statement is not wrong, it just seems unrelated.

    • jdeath@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      weird, i studied latin and the history of language just because i found it interesting. i am always seeking to improve my writing skills tho.