both companies notably ruined the internet in the 2010s by consolidating discourse then taking various steps to destroy the user experience and the feel of the communities for profit.

so, broadly, the web went from cozy, small hobby forums in the 90s and 00s, then with the 10s as a transitional period, the 20s being practically complete corporate control of online discourse.

it’s a bummer. but nothing lasts forever. where will we go next?

  • OpenStars@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    My first link used the dropdown menu. Fwiw, discuss.online says it is using “BE: 0.19.3”. So if I type e.g. exclamation-mark then start typing “newtolemmy…” it will fill in to [!newtolemmy@lemmy.ca](https://lemmy.ca/c/newtolemmy), and then iirc someone told me to remove the exclamation mark and… omg, it looks like *I* am the one messing these up!? Removing the exclamation mark results in newtolemmy@lemmy.ca, which takes me away from my instance, but leaving it in allows it to work properly.

    Regardless, that is still NOT intuitive, like AT ALL, b/c the URL makes it visually look like clicking it should go to “https://lemmy.ca/c/newtolemmy”, so what difference should the click-here text make - whether I call it “I am the very model of a major general” or !newtolemmy@lemmy.ca, the URL is what governs where a link goes, literally everywhere I’ve ever seen in the entire internet? (and the [whatever text here](URL goes here) format definitely presents itself as a “link”, not “code that will change the URL endpoint later”)

    Even so, it seems I have been spreading a bit of misinformation, and I apologize for that.

    Most especially for this reason and for so many others, I appreciate you so much, for taking the time to think about and correct me on this score - that is so very helpful, THANK YOU!!!

    • Blaze
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      No worries, happy to help. I guess that might solve some of the issues you detailed in the comment above.

      I skimmed through it, but some other points I was a bit confused about

      so if you attempt to visit https://lemmy.world/c/drpg you will get an error, as if that were an invalid community. It is a valid community though, it is just on a tiny instance that such people have not included in their nets

      The issue here is not about discuss.online being a small instance, but mostly you not using the URL with the instance name