I never went as far as to defend Gwyneth Paltrow, but after her Hot Ones appearance I created a post (which I will link in the comments) where I suggested that she’s done no more harm than male grifters and that the dislike of her as a person was primarily due to misogyny. That’s before I learned about her promotion of these unproven “vampire facials”. Now an unlicensed clinic performing this procedure has given at least three women HIV. You guys were right and I was wrong.

  • Letstakealook@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Your default assumption is that any criticism of a woman must be misogyny? Even when that woman’s actions primarily impact women’s health? Interesting.

    • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      This line of reasoning doesn’t make sense. Haters being worse to women than men specifically because of gender has nothing to do with what that person actually does.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I mean, yeah, she’s to blame for promoting an obviously batshit crazy process, but she was NOT involved with any of the facilities distributing HIV. That’s a bit of a stretch.

    It would be like, I dunno, blaming your favorite tattooed celebrity because you got hepatitis c from some back alley artist.

    • sgibson5150@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I see what you’re saying, but the treatment is unproven even under sanitary conditions and she probably helped make people aware of it using her largish social media platform. I say she deserves at least some of the blame.

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        So? When done safely perhaps it offers no benefit and very little risk - kind of like a tattoo

        Maybe it does work. We don’t know.

    • Ledivin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Tbf, it’s more like the tattooed celebrity was promoting back alley artists. It’s a weird middle ground

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I understand that she said it was a good and helpful procedure.

        I don’t think it’s at all fair to say she told people to go to unlicensed places

  • MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I wasn’t aware of her existence or that of the vampire facials, but this is some Carmilla stuff. Next they will tell you they need virgin blood.

    • sgibson5150@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Agreed. A bit skeevy on the face of it. I’ve often wondered if something like that is why Dick Cheney is still alive. “Bring in the next snackrifice!” Ugh.

      • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        In the show “Silicon Valley”, a satire of it’s namesake, there’s a billionaire tech ceo (like Google level) who gets weekly blood transfusions from a college student in great health.

        If you’d kindly adjust your tinfoil hat, there’s a lot of conspiracy theories out there that blood transfusions from healthy young people are a regular “health service” used by the elite.

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    There’s a phrase for that: Counterjerking too hard. Judging by the reactions you’re getting from this, seems you’ve done it twice in a row.

    Remember, counterjerking is not a principled stance; those who stand for nothing will fall for everything.