Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 14 hours agoSquare!lemmy.zipimagemessage-square92fedilinkarrow-up1854arrow-down125
arrow-up1829arrow-down1imageSquare!lemmy.zipMaven (famous)@lemmy.zip to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 14 hours agomessage-square92fedilink
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down6·7 hours agoWell then the line of separation means nothing and then you’ve lost a right angle to the contiguous void.
minus-squareThreeme2189@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·7 hours agoWhy? Does a cube floating in the void not have angles?
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down5·6 hours agoWithout a distinction of where the cube begins or ends it does not because there is no cube and there are no angles.
minus-squareThreeme2189@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 hours agoThe cube begins where the void ends and ends where the void begins.
minus-squareKlear@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-235 minutes agoFun fact - there are no actual cubes anywhere in the universe. All geometric shapes are an abstraction. There are no cubes and no angles, so that checks out.
Well then the line of separation means nothing and then you’ve lost a right angle to the contiguous void.
Why? Does a cube floating in the void not have angles?
Without a distinction of where the cube begins or ends it does not because there is no cube and there are no angles.
The cube begins where the void ends and ends where the void begins.
Fun fact - there are no actual cubes anywhere in the universe. All geometric shapes are an abstraction. There are no cubes and no angles, so that checks out.