Their pitch expressly claims the device isn’t AT… But it is to help more people access the outdoors, which I think counts to an extent.

  • Shou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not to shit on someone’s plate here, but won’t that weaken people’s legs?

    I get it for extreme hikes, but otherwise, isn’t it better to get the exercise?

    • ctag@lemmy.sdf.orgOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I met a medically retired marine back when I was in school that changed my view on this. His superior insisted on his group walking as much as possible with their packs, but instead of it just being extra exercise he wound up having to get an amputation after all of the stress on his legs lead to an issue with the arteries or veins. At a certain point, extra punishment isn’t beneficial, and a mechanism to manage it would be useful.

      • Shou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        As I mentioned before. It seems useful for extreme hikes. Not for normal ones.

        Punishment like excessive training never is beneficial. It kills people.

        • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          ++ this thing wouldn’t have helped. Excessive standing, walking or not will damage your legs. Moving can help tho