• Star@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Not to discredit your arguement but isn’t Signal also centralised?

    • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The data is not centralized in the same way, making it slightly better, but yeah. A lot of the same pitfalls of centralization happen there. The whole system doesn’t operate without the corporate servers in the middle, even though they don’t see or store the data. They have total access to Metadata. The organization could be sold for profit, shut down, change terms, etc.

      If security is important, you’re better off with something decentralized like matrix. I’m not an expert, so hopefully, a lot of people here who are smarter than me will fact check these statements, but at least those are my impressions.

    • MiltownClowns@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It is, which is why the comment didn’t advocate for it. Signal has more robust encryption than telegram, but its not zero-trust. They should really be using private hosted services instead of public or pgp, but when battle kicks off you use whatever works and then go back and revise as needed when you’re not dodging bombs.