jeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 5 months agoJoe Biden Hits Back at The New York Times After it Tells Him to Drop Out of Racewww.thedailybeast.comexternal-linkmessage-square88fedilinkarrow-up1259arrow-down113
arrow-up1246arrow-down1external-linkJoe Biden Hits Back at The New York Times After it Tells Him to Drop Out of Racewww.thedailybeast.comjeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square88fedilink
minus-squareTempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 months agoI’m talking about the date and time of it being changed. You wrote: dropped the fact checking that afternoon But from what I can tell, the rules had been set for a couple of months.
minus-squareFarFarAway@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·5 months agoNot the op you responded to, but, I suppose, it’s a fair question. Although unsure of the timeline, the fact checking drop is something that was definitely agreed to by both parties before hand. Maybe they’re referring to how “Before the debate, Biden allies tried to pressure the CNN moderators, Jake Tapper and Dana Bash, to aggressively fact-check any false statements made by Mr. Trump. CNN leadership made clear that the moderators would facilitate the discussion but that any fact-checking would be left to the candidates.”. Like they had a chance to reconsider, but decided to stick with the original terms?
I’m talking about the date and time of it being changed. You wrote:
But from what I can tell, the rules had been set for a couple of months.
Not the op you responded to, but, I suppose, it’s a fair question.
Although unsure of the timeline, the fact checking drop is something that was definitely agreed to by both parties before hand.
Maybe they’re referring to how “Before the debate, Biden allies tried to pressure the CNN moderators, Jake Tapper and Dana Bash, to aggressively fact-check any false statements made by Mr. Trump. CNN leadership made clear that the moderators would facilitate the discussion but that any fact-checking would be left to the candidates.”. Like they had a chance to reconsider, but decided to stick with the original terms?