• DreamButt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    3 months ago

    This applies to software dev too. Except instead of windows updates it’s debugging Nvidia drivers on Linux

    • spicy pancake@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      we used Macs at my last lab

      I hated them because I’m a Linux nerd but at least they were reliable

      (I suppose if my research PC ran Linux I’d spend all my time configuring it instead of researching…!)

    • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Updating my computers from Ubuntu 22.04 to 24.04 was a whole day process. It doesn’t help that the upgrade tool requires you to press enter every so often.

      (Yeah yeah I should try other distros. I’ll play with other distros when I’m not spending my time as pictured in the meme.)

      (To be clear this is on a couple computer I personally own. The ones the lab owns are on Ubuntu 20.04 if I’m lucky…)

      • Zoot@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Yes, but atleast you can choose when you want to do that, you clan plan ahead and block out a day specifically for just updating.

        Can’t say the same about a windows update. (Sometimes you can put it off till a certain date, if you catch it)

    • Shampiss@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Why shouldn’t people use windows?

      You can’t expect the average person to be tech savvy enough to use Linux and most people cannot afford a Mac. Especially in developing countries.

      Windows is the best OS for the average person. Just not for advanced users such as researchers

      • Lordbaum@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        You don’t need to be tech savvy to use Linux there are more than enough distros where you need as much knowledge as you need to use windows I wouldn’t call everybody how owns a steam deck a tech savvy person. The only user friendly advantage is that Windows comes for some reason preinstalled on almost every device. If this weren’t the case and the average consumers had a choice the picture would be very different.

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        You can’t expect the average person to be tech savvy enough to use Linux

        I don’t understand. They are tech savvy enough to use Windows tho (and not be used by it)?

  • ftbd
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    You guys are using windows?

        • jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          3 months ago

          Sure, but I highly doubt they are making policy where they work. I don’t think most employers would be happy about some random researcher not only plugging in a flash drive from home, but using it to install unapproved software (a full OS at that).

          • Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            If you’re cold they’re cold pug that random flashdrive from the ground out side into the nearest computer.

        • Contramuffin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          3 months ago

          Is it alright to go around wiping the OS off of other people’s computers?

          • is what your comment reads like to me.

          To be clear: each machine generally needs a computer to be permanently plugged into it. Generally the computer belongs to the university. You’re not plugging in your own personal laptop into the machine. Saying to install Linux on these computers is essentially tampering with the university’s electronics and IT will be very unhappy that you did that.

    • Purox
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Theoretical physicist here: the hole chair uses Linux, except for two persons that use MacOS

  • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    3 months ago

    Jeez, you fools. How about rolling into the lab at 11, drinking coffee till 11:30, have at most half an hour to reminiscue about yesterday’s failures, while looking at results well-knowing they’re unsalvageable, and then going for lunch with the crew?

    If you start your day at 8:30, you misunderstood that it’s not your paycheck that makes a PhD great.

    • spicy pancake@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      I rarely arrived at the lab before 10am as an undergrad intern. (And usually stayed until 7–8pm because I goofed around too much and it took forever to get all the cells taken care of 🫠)

      Flexible schedules are a luxury I miss dearly

  • Trollception@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    When’s the last time a Windows update took more than 30 minutes? It takes about the same time to update my FreeNAS box as it does to install windows/upgrade to a new version

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Obviously their science grands only paid for SATA hard drives and a 150kbps network bandwidth.