• Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh look someone with a Pro-Genocide tag shows up to defend charging people for the violence committed against them.

    Such surprise.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        Your name is rather distinctive. But just to make sure I didn’t forget about your shilling for Israeli Apartheid and War Crimes I added a tag. So yeah I’m not surprised you’re in favor of charging people with murder for the police shooting their friends.

        • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          But just to make sure I didn’t forget about your shilling for Israeli Apartheid and War Crimes I added a tag.

          Thats churlish. You can’t handle disagreeing with someone?

          Why not just say: “I haven’t figured out how to handle my emotions yet”?

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            No I can disagree with people just fine. But I don’t tolerate the presence of people who use propaganda to defend the most blatant and horrendous war crimes. It’s the same as tolerating the presence of a neo Nazi. For the record Israel hit another IDP camp this week, the EU and Human Rights Watch have said Israel is using starvation as a weapon against the Palestinian people, and now 7 of our allies are restricting or refusing arms sales to Israel.

            Furthermore I mean what I said above literally. I am not surprised to find a defender of all of that coming here to defend the felony murder rule being used when the police did the killing.

            Or, and this just struck me, are you saying my shit memory for people means I’m churlish?

            • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              The two have nothing to do with each other. You seem unhinged. It was also you that brought up Israel. Its a strawman and you just committed to it again in this reply.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Okay let me break this down Barney style.

                Support for Authoritarian A makes support for Authoritarian B unsurprising.

                Get it now?

                • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I never said I didn’t understand, I said I disagree with the logic of bringing it up. You can do whatever you want, I won’t stop you. I do still think you maybe need some emotional regulation help but if you can’t handle disagreeing with complete strangers on the internet, I won’t force you into it.

          • ???@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Why are you always mean when people disagree with you? I noticed this a lot. You always claim that you can’t dumb it down further to someone else. Strange mechanism to defend your opinion.

            • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              To be fair, they replied to a question in good faith and then the other person replied by calling them pro-genocide.

              • ???@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                If you read most things JustZ, you would probably take that back… JustZ is a genocide denier in every sense of the word and they always say the other person is dumb when they are challenged.

                • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  One opinion has nothing to do with the other. Seems like they earnestly hold their positions, whether I disagree with them or not. Y’all are just trying to take shortcuts to judging someone’s character. You know next to nothing about them.

                  • ???@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    I invite you to read the rest of the shit he writes. You won’t need shortcuts.

                  • glockenspiel@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Kind of funny. The same folks saying Smith’s prior involvement in uncharged murders shouldn’t be considered in his sentencing are also making summary judgments against commenters based on comment history.

                    Some folks just really embrace contrarianism as a personality trait I suppose.