Bonus:

The Omega molecule

According to Seven of Nine -

Omega is infinitely complex, yet harmonious. To the Borg it represents perfection. I wish to understand that perfection.

    • VitaminF
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      Crying is the main theme of discovery, so…

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago
    1. That would have been an infinitely better cause of the burn than what was given. Ugh. I loved Discovery but not that.
    2. Omega destroys subspace, so no warp travel would have been possible. That would have left Discovery as the only FTL-capable ship in the galaxy (rather than warp still being possible but used sparingly due to limited supply of “working” dilithium).

    I feel like #2 would have limited the plot too much since there wouldn’t be any danger Discovery couldn’t just jump away from (no one would be able to chase them).

    Then, the “fix the burn” plot would have involved either mass-producing spore drives for everyone in the 31st century (which would have been cool, though they didn’t solve the living navigator problem) or pulling a brand-new FTL method out of their ass that everyone else had been trying and failing to do for the last few hundred years.

    Edit: I guess since Omega can do anything the writers want, I suppose rather than destroying subspace itself it could have rendered the dilithium inert to cause the burn and everything else plays out the same except the stupid ending.

    • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 months ago

      What could have been cool is if omega molecule nuked large sections of subspace where ships currently were and it led to thin cooridors where warp travel was still possible…but that’s where pirate groups like Emerald Chain showed up taking control of them. Starfleet was already spread so thin they could barely maintain control which led to the fracturing

    • ummthatguy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      I like those solutions. The one I thought up was Stamets discovering something in the mycelial network that can regenerate subspace.

    • thejoker954@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      In regards to 2 - even with warp available to other ships the spore drive still gives the ability to jump away from any danger as they could jump just about anywhere.

  • rah@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I believe that this was already the case. Many moons ago I read a synopsis of a Star Trek show pitch that was slated for development which was set in the future and where warp travel was limited due to the use of an omega bomb. When I watched Discovery, I thought it was just a reworking of that original omega-based idea.

    Edit: found it! https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Star_Trek:_Final_Frontier

    • ummthatguy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Crazy stuff. Seems like they took the destruction of Andoria concept and later refit it to Romulus. And as with many turn of the century concepts, wanted to be super edgy.

      Thanks for sharing!

    • Guy Fleegman@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      “Is Discovery canon?” is an interesting question because the only real purpose canon serves is to give us boundaries for where it’s reasonable to stop expecting (searching for?) a degree of consistency throughout all of Star Trek

      When someone says “that’s not canon” what they’re usually telling you is that they don’t care to reconcile it with other Trek

      Given that Discovery is two seasons of “top secret classified never happened” and three seasons of “800 years later than any other series,” even if we decided it was canon in some technical or legal sense, it gives us basically nothing that could potentially influence other Star Trek, before or since. In other words, it’s not canon in any practical or meaningful sense.

      tl;dr yeah I guess you’re right

      • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Strange New Worlds spins off from Discovery and carries on plot elements established there. Section 31 continues Georgiou’s story, and Starfleet Academy is picking up on the 31st century setting and characters. That’s a lot of ongoing influence.

    • teft@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Discovery isn’t canon

      Disco is great for memes and gifs.

      • 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        I definitely loved certain aspects of discovery lol. I just hated how f’d up they made the rest of the timeline and I don’t love the future they locked TNG era into even if it was an interesting story to tell (except for the final episode with crying kid destroying dilithium because wtf)

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’d ask what Discovery is except I know what it is and I didn’t like it at all. So, yeah.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      There is no official canon for any universe, everyone has their own interpretation.

      Paramounts interpretation is just one of many for Star Trek.