• rglullis@communick.newsOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Nice, I just hope that you are contributing with more than $1-2 per year. ;)

    Also, if you understand the importance of support it the instances, why don’t you wish that everyone did the same?

      • Blaze (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        But a paywall adds a considerable barrier to entry.

        Indeed. We are already struggling to get users and content, adding a paywall would probably kill the platform

      • rglullis@communick.newsOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        a paywall adds a considerable barrier to entry.

        The idea is to get rid of “instances with open registrations”. It doesn’t mean that paywalled instances are the only way to achieve that.

        • We can have more people running their own small servers to share with their friends
        • We can have companies providing ActivityPub accounts to customers of their services (e.g, sign-up to the NYT and get access to any of the servers managed by Mastodon GmbH)
        • We can have companies operating their own AP servers for their employees
        • We can have phone/internet companies giving access to their AP servers as long as they have a contract or a positive balance on the top-up
        • We can have “pay it forward” instances: admins put up donations, but they explicitly declare how much they want per active user account. The instance only accepts new registrations when it has secured the resources.