• AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The reality is also, that development is so extremely diverse, that it’s hard to find umbrella-enough terms to describe a job.

    For example, I’m a senior software developer on paper.

    I’m not senior, not even 10 years job experience. But I seem to be rather good at what I’m doing, so I’m a senior now.

    I’m also hardly writing any code. I talk to customers about what they want their software to do, I talk to management about how many people I need, I review pull requests, I talk to junior devs about their problems, etc, etc. Maybe 10% of my time is actual code. But what title other than “developer” should I have?

    • Sailing7@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      A few more titles that you will hate, but actually describe your role. You are in no sense just a senior developer.

      You are an

      • Architect
      • Solution Architect
      • Project Manager and Team Leader
      • Service Manager

      Which one fits best, you have to decide. But i would put this up on my resume if i had your responsibilities.

      • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s not a huge project (3-4 devs, including myself), there’s simply not enough to do for a dedicated architect. PM and SM are done by dedicated roles, but as a lead dev, I obviously have to play translator quite a bit.