One thing that leaps out at me about this ruling is that courts understand the internet a lot better nowadays. A decade or so ago Sony would have probably gotten away with the argument that Cox profited from the users’ piracy; nowadays judges themselves use the internet and are going to go “lolno, they probably would have been Cox customers anyway. It’s not like anyone pays for internet connection solely to pirate. And in most areas people don’t even have a choice of provider, so how is Cox profiting from this?”

  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Don’t believe that you’re always gonna be protected by some judge somewhere.

    Get a proper VPN, dammit!

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Your so-called “rights” won’t hold to the pressure of massive media capital alone. It will erode away.

        • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          They have so far. It’s still legal to use a VPN without verifying my identity. It’s still legal, though difficult, to access the Internet anonymously. The local police department doesn’t blanket monitor everyone’s search history.

          increasingly difficult tech solutions for privacy are a bandaid not a cure.

    • Lemonparty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yo! What’s a proper VPN these days? It seems like all the ones I used to trust went to shit.

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Edit: looks like I need a new VPN…

        I use private internet access (pia). It’s reasonably priced, really good for the number of devices, and I don’t believe they keep logs. At least it used to be that way, but I haven’t checked that since I signed up a decade ago. I have had zero issues with anything or anyone while using it for any reason. Uptime is basically 100%. Also has mobile support if that matters.

    • Fubber Nuckin'@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Ikr? It’s like they’re counting every act of digital piracy ever to be their lost profits when that’s obviously not the case.

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It’s not “like”, that has been the argument with these piracy cases for ages. If I pirate 100 movies, it obviously means that if I couldn’t have I would have gone to the shop to buy each and every one of them. It’s even worse for anyone caught distributing the downloads, where a site host can be hit with this logic for every user download ever.

        Apparently these days they are claiming that movie and TV piracy costs the US film industry $29-71 billion a year and the US GDP a cool $115 billion in total
        Because, you know, we have all that money just floating in our pockets now thanks to piracy.

  • moshtradamus666@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I live in Brazil, there are many problems here and stuff. But at least no one gives a fuck about piracy, lol. Never needed a VPN for torrents, not gonna need anytime soon.