• ram@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are two Linux paradigms that I consider stupid. One is the use of centralized software repositories managed by the distro instead of individual developer maintained installers. The other one is file system case sensibility. They already admitted defeat on the first one with the rise of containerised applications. I wonder how much longer they’ll keep the charade on the second one.

    • smiletolerantly@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sorry, but you’re plain wrong on your first issue. Getting all your packages from one source is one of the biggest upsides of Linux.

      • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Indeed, but I’m sure we can agree that it’s pretty stupid for every distro to maintain its own repo. That’s a lot of duplicate work, which could be spend on more useful things. Luckily flatpak is well on its way to change that

        • smiletolerantly@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hm… But different distros have different philosophies (not just) about updates. That’s part of why people choose a specific distro.

          Theres still plenty speaking against flatpak (larger sizes, problems with GTK/qt themes, and it’s only meant for GUI applications - you still need a separate system for the kernel and lower-level/cli tools. And frankly, that makes flatpak unusable to me, because the purpose of a centralized package management system is not having duplicate systems).

          So in short: y’all are gonna pry pacman from my cold, dead hand.