SomeoneElse@lemmy.worldM to Confidently Incorrect@lemmy.world · 1 year agoYou probably don’t need a masters degree to debunk this one.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageYou probably don’t need a masters degree to debunk this one.lemmy.worldSomeoneElse@lemmy.worldM to Confidently Incorrect@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square20fedilink
minus-squarePiecemakers@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoAre you equating the nuance of a timeless literary classic to a sheltered white guy’s childhood? For real?
minus-squareZombiepirate@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoNo, I’m saying that if you ask someone to summarize a lengthy piece then it’s a bit ridiculous to complain about the lack of details.
minus-squarePiecemakers@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-21 year agoYes, and I’m starting that if you attempt to summarize, do be sure to touch on key points rather than boiling it down to such a degree that it’s indistinguishable from mud. Pretty basic stuff, friend. Thanks for trying, though.
minus-squareaeno ⌨️@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoOr, you could just watch that documentation for yourself instead of bitching about an answer someone gave to your question for free.
Are you equating the nuance of a timeless literary classic to a sheltered white guy’s childhood? For real?
No, I’m saying that if you ask someone to summarize a lengthy piece then it’s a bit ridiculous to complain about the lack of details.
Yes, and I’m starting that if you attempt to summarize, do be sure to touch on key points rather than boiling it down to such a degree that it’s indistinguishable from mud. Pretty basic stuff, friend. Thanks for trying, though.
Or, you could just watch that documentation for yourself instead of bitching about an answer someone gave to your question for free.