• GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        First, your juvenile ad hominems and wild speculation, not to mention your poor use of language incline me to believe you aren’t a journalist, or at least a journalist that I’m not inclined to think worth reading. But feel free to prove me wrong. Where would I find this article in which you drop pearls of wisdom for the unwashed masses such as myself? Did you get pictures of these earrings that she was handing out? Did she refuse to even let you get pictures, and convince the other recipients of her goods to also shield them from your unworthy focus? And please, don’t tell me you don’t want to advertise your professional work, or that of your peers. You already mentioned it.

        Also, I haven’t watched Naruto, but you apparently haven’t seen The Princess Bride.

        • suction@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago
          1. You need to be more concise. First rule of journalist school.
          2. Have you ever tried the hentai? That stuff really gets your juices flowin‘!
          • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I don’t pretend to be a journalist. I hear presenting facts is also important, and you have yet to do that despite your claims.

              • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                But I’m not just talking to you, I’m also talking to the other people viewing this thread. Just like how it’s laughable to say you can’t be bothered to prove your dubious claims after engaging in communication about a subject half a dozen times over 2 days. The liklier conclusion is that they are as reasonable as your first - possibly true, but no substantive proof given.